Munimetric Water System Profile

Lpwdn South Region, LA

Drinking Water Infrastructure Profile

Munimetric analysis of drinking water infrastructure in Lpwdn South Region, LA, Louisiana, including MISI stress score, active signals, and peer-relative monitoring context. This profile highlights what is happening and why it matters using water-system, fiscal, capital, and signal context.

Lpwdn South Region, LA has a MISI infrastructure stress score of 10.9/100 in the Stable band as of 2026-05-28. Public records show groundwater sourcing, PFAS monitoring context, lead and copper compliance context and approximately 4,032 residents served. Updated May 2026.

StableScore date May 28, 2026Methodology v0.1.2

State context

Current market shown in covered state context. Tile size reflects population served; color reflects stress band.

10.9Headline composite
StableBand
82%Confidence
~4KPop. served
P7Peer percentile
4Active signals

Current headline composite

Component of current headline composite

Infrastructure Stress5.5 / 100

Physical, compliance, and capital-execution pressure reflected in the blended headline composite.

Socioeconomic Stress0.0 / 100

Affordability, demand-base, and parent-government fiscal pressure reflected in the blended headline composite.

Observability Stress5.5 / 100

Staleness, disclosure freshness, and reporting-visibility effects reflected in the blended headline composite.

10.9/100 headline compositeStable82% confidencedrinking_water::community_water_system::under_25k::ground_water~4K people served

Monitoring context stored

Water Quality & Supply Context

Public-record context for this system. Stored monitoring and compliance records only. Does not change MISI.

Public records
Records presentLAPWSID LA1055192.
Recent violations
2 recordsTotal Coliform Rule
Enforcement records
5 recordsStored public enforcement rows.
PFAS monitoring records
Not storedNo PFAS monitoring summary is stored for this system; missing summaries remain unknown.
Lead/copper monitoring records
Records stored6 samplesStored lead/copper records list 0 open LCR violations and 0 action-level records.
Source / supply context
GroundwaterIdentity4,032 served; Dec 31, 2025.

Executive context

What the Data Suggests

Lpwdn South Region, LA is a smaller community water system, serving approximately 4,032 residents. At the latest reading, the system shows limited signs of structural stress.

The score is being driven mainly by Operational Stress, with Governance Risk contributing at a lower level. The pressure is distributed rather than concentrated in a single dimension.

2 active stress signals are attached to this system, including 2 at high severity. Multiple high-severity signals suggest the score is not being lifted by background noise alone.

Within Community · < 25k · Ground, this system ranks around the 7th percentile on measured stress, placing it among the least stressed in its peer group.

Recent score history has been relatively steady, consistent with the system's overall profile.

This summary is based on structured, source-backed public data and is intended for research and monitoring only. It is not investment advice, a credit opinion, or municipal advisory guidance.

Analytical posture

Market Stress Analytics

Family Contribution

MISI family contributions for this market.

Operational StressOperational Stress: 5.5 / 20.05.5Governance RiskGovernance Risk: 5.5 / 20.05.5Capex PressureCapex Pressure: 0.0 / 20.00.0Revenue FragilityRevenue Fragility: 0.0 / 20.00.0Rate ConstraintRate Constraint: 0.0 / 20.00.0

Peer Position

Where Lpwdn South Region sits within its peer cohort.

0%25%50%75%100%10.9drinking_water::community_water_system::under_25k::ground_water · 3486 systems · 7th percentileLess stressMore stress
Income ErosionIncome Erosion: 15.2% weight — Available 15.2%Compliance EscalationCompliance Escalation: 9.1% weight — Available 9.1%Infrastructure Capit…Infrastructure Capital Gap: 9.1% weight — Missing 9.1%Population Served De…Population Served Decline: 7.6% weight — Available 7.6%Housing Market Weakn…Housing Market Weakness: 7.6% weight — Available 7.6%Parent-Government Fi…Parent-Government Fiscal Stress: 7.6% weight — No parent-government fiscal overlay is available for this service market. 7.6%Monitoring / Reporti…Monitoring / Reporting Failures: 6.1% weight — Available 6.1%Climate Hazard Expos…Climate Hazard Exposure: 6.1% weight — Available 6.1%Lead & Copper Rule R…Lead & Copper Rule Risk: 6.1% weight — Available 6.1%PFAS Contamination R…PFAS Contamination Risk: 6.1% weight — No UCMR PFAS snapshot is available for this system. 6.1%SRF Dependence SpikeSRF Dependence Spike: 6.1% weight — Available 6.1%Utility Data StalenessUtility Data Staleness: 4.5% weight — Available 4.5%High-AGI Out-MigrationHigh-AGI Out-Migration: 3.0% weight — Available 3.0%Formal Enforcement O…Formal Enforcement Obligations: 3.0% weight — Available 3.0%Rapid Score Deterior…Rapid Score Deterioration: 3.0% weight — Available 3.0%
AvailableMissing

Score History

Latest

10.9

Trend

+10.9

Observations

46

Mar 24, 2026 · 0.0Mar 25, 2026 · 0.0Mar 29, 2026 · 0.0Apr 2, 2026 · 6.0Apr 3, 2026 · 6.0Apr 3, 2026 · 6.0Apr 4, 2026 · 6.0Apr 5, 2026 · 6.0Apr 5, 2026 · 6.0Apr 6, 2026 · 14.0Apr 7, 2026 · 14.0Apr 8, 2026 · 14.0Apr 9, 2026 · 14.0Apr 10, 2026 · 14.0Apr 13, 2026 · 14.0Apr 14, 2026 · 14.0Apr 18, 2026 · 14.0Apr 19, 2026 · 14.0Apr 21, 2026 · 16.0Apr 22, 2026 · 16.0Apr 23, 2026 · 16.0Apr 24, 2026 · 16.0Apr 25, 2026 · 16.0Apr 26, 2026 · 14.6Apr 26, 2026 · 16.0Apr 27, 2026 · 14.6Apr 28, 2026 · 14.6Apr 29, 2026 · 14.6Apr 30, 2026 · 14.6May 1, 2026 · 14.6May 2, 2026 · 14.6May 3, 2026 · 14.6May 4, 2026 · 14.6May 5, 2026 · 14.6May 6, 2026 · 14.6May 7, 2026 · 14.6May 8, 2026 · 14.6May 9, 2026 · 14.6May 10, 2026 · 14.6May 17, 2026 · 10.9May 19, 2026 · 10.9May 21, 2026 · 10.9May 22, 2026 · 10.9May 24, 2026 · 10.9May 26, 2026 · 10.9May 28, 2026 · 10.9Mar 24, 2026May 28, 2026

Structural Indicators

Operational Stress5.5 / 20.0

Operational Stress totals 5.473 points, led by climate hazard exposure.

Capex Pressure0.0 / 20.0

Capex Pressure totals 0.000 points with no triggered factors.

Revenue Fragility0.0 / 20.0

Revenue Fragility totals 0.000 points with no triggered factors.

Rate Constraint0.0 / 20.0

Rate Constraint totals 0.000 points with no triggered factors.

Governance Risk5.5 / 20.0

Governance Risk totals 5.473 points, led by utility data staleness.

Stress movement

Diagnostics

Diagnostics & Movement

Compact status for confidence, data coverage, disclosure freshness, and stored score movement. Detailed diagnostic history remains available below.

Confidence

82%

Confidence is mainly capped by missing factor coverage.

Factor coverage

Complete

All tracked confidence factors are currently available.

Disclosure freshness

Not available

No attached disclosure document has a usable reference date. Some profile sections are selectively summarized because confidence is currently medium.

Latest movement

flat 0.0

Compared with May 26, 2026.

Last material movement

-3.7

Recorded May 17, 2026.

History

46 observations stored

Latest stored observation May 28, 2026.

Show detailed diagnostic history

Expanded stress diagnostics

Open detailed contribution diagnostics

No detailed factor diagnostics are stored for this profile snapshot.

Confidence summary

Confidence is mainly capped by missing factor coverage.

Missing factor coverage

No factor gaps are recorded on the latest stored score.

Disclosure freshness diagnostics

0 attached local documents · 0 structured facts

No attached disclosure document has a usable reference date. Some profile sections are selectively summarized because confidence is currently medium.

Latest reference Not available · stale after Not available

Score movement

flat 0.0

Previous run May 26, 2026

May 28, 2026

Score 10.9 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 26, 2026

Score 10.9 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 24, 2026

Score 10.9 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 22, 2026

Score 10.9 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 21, 2026

Score 10.9 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 19, 2026

Score 10.9 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 17, 2026

Score 10.9 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run -3.7

May 10, 2026

Score 14.6 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 9, 2026

Score 14.6 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 8, 2026

Score 14.6 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 7, 2026

Score 14.6 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 6, 2026

Score 14.6 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 5, 2026

Score 14.6 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 4, 2026

Score 14.6 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 3, 2026

Score 14.6 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 2, 2026

Score 14.6 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 1, 2026

Score 14.6 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 30, 2026

Score 14.6 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 29, 2026

Score 14.6 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 28, 2026

Score 14.6 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 27, 2026

Score 14.6 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 26, 2026

Score 14.6 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run -1.4

Apr 26, 2026

Score 16.0 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 25, 2026

Score 16.0 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 24, 2026

Score 16.0 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 23, 2026

Score 16.0 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 22, 2026

Score 16.0 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 21, 2026

Score 16.0 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 2.0

Apr 19, 2026

Score 14.0 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 18, 2026

Score 14.0 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 14, 2026

Score 14.0 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 13, 2026

Score 14.0 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 10, 2026

Score 14.0 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 9, 2026

Score 14.0 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 8, 2026

Score 14.0 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 7, 2026

Score 14.0 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 6, 2026

Score 14.0 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 8.0

Apr 5, 2026

Score 6.0 in band stable. Confidence 73%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 5, 2026

Score 6.0 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 4, 2026

Score 6.0 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 3, 2026

Score 6.0 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 3, 2026

Score 6.0 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 2, 2026

Score 6.0 in band stable. Confidence 82%.

Delta vs prior run 6.0

Mar 29, 2026

Score 0.0 in band stable. Confidence 79%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Mar 25, 2026

Score 0.0 in band stable. Confidence 79%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Mar 24, 2026

Score 0.0 in band stable. Confidence 79%.

Signals

Signal Timeline

MaterialresolvedNot availableRank #1

Signal
current drought severity
Score impact
Not available
Resolved
May 17, 2026
SignificantactiveNot availableRank #2

Signal
climate hazard exposure
Score impact
Not available
Resolved
Active
SignificantresolvedNot availableRank #3

Signal
climate hazard exposure
Score impact
Not available
Resolved
Apr 7, 2026
SignificantactiveNot availableRank #4

Signal
Utility Data Staleness
Score impact
Not available
Resolved
Active

Keep monitoring this market

Briefs and research access cover repeat monitoring, saved work, alerts, and team review.

About Lpwdn South Region, LA

Lpwdn South Region, LA is a community drinking-water system in Louisiana that Munimetric monitors for infrastructure stress. The current MISI score of 10.9 out of 100 places this system in the stable stress band as of 2026-05-28. The MISI composite reflects five structural risk families: Operational Stress, Capex Pressure, Revenue Fragility, Rate Constraint, and Governance Risk. Higher scores indicate more structural stress.

Data is assembled from EPA SDWA compliance records, American Community Survey demographic and economic indicators, FEMA National Risk Index hazard exposure data, state-reported financial disclosures, and stored public-record water quality context where available. This system serves approximately 4,032 people. The system has 2 recorded compliance violations in the SDWA record. Munimetric does not fabricate data where public records are unavailable. This profile is for structural monitoring and research—not a current-condition determination or credit rating. Updated May 2026.

What is the Munimetric score for Lpwdn South Region, LA?
The current Munimetric Infrastructure Stress Index (MISI) score for Lpwdn South Region, LA is 10.9 out of 100, placing this system in the stable stress band. MISI is a composite of five structural risk families. Higher values indicate more stress. The score is deterministic, source-backed, and updated as new data becomes available.
Does Lpwdn South Region, LA show signs of drinking-water infrastructure stress?
Munimetric monitors structural stress indicators for Lpwdn South Region, LA across operational conditions, capital needs, revenue stability, rate affordability, and governance quality. The current MISI score and active signals shown in this profile reflect the latest available evidence from EPA, ACS, FEMA NRI, and state financial disclosures.
Does Munimetric rate current tap-water conditions for Lpwdn South Region, LA?
No. Munimetric is not a water testing service and does not make current-condition determinations. This profile tracks structural conditions: compliance posture, financial pressure, infrastructure stress, and governance quality. For current water quality testing results, consult the system's Consumer Confidence Report or contact the local water utility.
Has Lpwdn South Region, LA had a boil water advisory?
Munimetric does not track real-time boil water advisories. For current advisory status, contact your local water utility or state drinking water program. This profile tracks structural risk indicators and compliance history that provide long-term context around system reliability.
Are lead pipes or corrosion risk a concern in Lpwdn South Region, LA?
Where EPA SDWA compliance data includes lead and copper rule monitoring, violations, or enforcement actions, that information feeds into the Operational Stress component of the MISI score. Munimetric does not fabricate lead pipe data where public records are silent.
Does Munimetric include PFAS monitoring context for Lpwdn South Region, LA?
Where stored public records include UCMR or contaminant-monitoring summaries, Munimetric displays PFAS monitoring context as public-record evidence. Missing PFAS summaries are treated as missing records, not as non-detections. This context does not change MISI by itself.
What source-water context is available for Lpwdn South Region, LA?
Munimetric displays stored source-water and supply context where public drinking-water identity records are available. Source-water context helps explain treatment and supply exposure, but missing source records remain explicit rather than inferred.
Why might water rates be increasing in Lpwdn South Region, LA?
Rate pressure can reflect capital investment needs, a declining customer base, revenue fragility, affordability constraints, or parent-government fiscal stress. The Rate Constraint and Revenue Fragility score families specifically measure these pressures where data is available from public financial disclosures.
What does the MISI score mean for Lpwdn South Region, LA?
The MISI score (10.9/100) is a composite measure of structural risk across five families: Operational Stress, Capex Pressure, Revenue Fragility, Rate Constraint, and Governance Risk. The headline remains a blended structural stress composite rather than a pure physical-condition index. The current methodology also downweights factors that are nearly universal or very rare in the frozen national reference population, so one common contextual factor does not dominate the headline by itself. Higher scores indicate more structural stress. It is deterministic and source-backed, not a credit rating.