MunimetricMunicipal Infrastructure Intelligence

MUNIMETRIC STATE INDEX

U.S. Drinking Water Infrastructure Stress by State

Compare structural stress across all 50 states and territories using the Munimetric State Index. Explore state-level scores, system coverage, signal activity, public-record water quality context, PFAS monitoring records, lead and copper context, and trend behavior across community drinking-water infrastructure. Updated May 2026.

MA37.9(0.0)watchCT33.6(0.0)watchOK32.6(0.0)watchLA32.5(0.0)watchPA31.5(0.0)watchNM31.5(0.0)watchNJ31.4(0.0)watchAK30.2(0.0)watchWV29.6(0.0)watchMO29.3(0.0)watchSC29.1(0.0)watchOH28.7(0.0)watchFL28.7(0.0)watchDC28.5(0.0)watchOR27.5(0.0)watchIL27.5(0.0)watchWA27.2(0.0)watchMS27.0(0.0)watchUT26.7(0.0)watchMN26.7(0.0)watchAZ26.6(0.0)watchKS26.5(0.0)watchRI26.3(0.0)watchMD25.9(0.0)watchCO25.2(0.0)watchNC25.1(0.0)watchTX24.9(0.0)watchAR24.3(0.0)watchDE24.3(0.0)watchSD24.3(0.0)watchIA22.8(0.0)watchIN22.7(0.0)watchWI22.3(0.0)watchNV22.2(0.0)watchNY22.0(0.0)watchAL22.0(0.0)watchTN21.9(0.0)watchCA21.7(0.0)watchNE21.3(0.0)watchID21.2(0.0)watchHI21.2(0.0)watchNH21.2(0.0)watchKY20.8(0.0)stableWY20.6(0.0)stableVT20.1(0.0)stableGA19.9(0.0)stableND19.9(0.0)watchVA19.9(0.0)stableME19.9(0.0)watchMT19.2(0.0)stableMI18.8(0.0)stablePR5.9(0.0)stableMA37.9(0.0)watchCT33.6(0.0)watchOK32.6(0.0)watchLA32.5(0.0)watchPA31.5(0.0)watchNM31.5(0.0)watchNJ31.4(0.0)watchAK30.2(0.0)watchWV29.6(0.0)watchMO29.3(0.0)watchSC29.1(0.0)watchOH28.7(0.0)watchFL28.7(0.0)watchDC28.5(0.0)watchOR27.5(0.0)watchIL27.5(0.0)watchWA27.2(0.0)watchMS27.0(0.0)watchUT26.7(0.0)watchMN26.7(0.0)watchAZ26.6(0.0)watchKS26.5(0.0)watchRI26.3(0.0)watchMD25.9(0.0)watchCO25.2(0.0)watchNC25.1(0.0)watchTX24.9(0.0)watchAR24.3(0.0)watchDE24.3(0.0)watchSD24.3(0.0)watchIA22.8(0.0)watchIN22.7(0.0)watchWI22.3(0.0)watchNV22.2(0.0)watchNY22.0(0.0)watchAL22.0(0.0)watchTN21.9(0.0)watchCA21.7(0.0)watchNE21.3(0.0)watchID21.2(0.0)watchHI21.2(0.0)watchNH21.2(0.0)watchKY20.8(0.0)stableWY20.6(0.0)stableVT20.1(0.0)stableGA19.9(0.0)stableND19.9(0.0)watchVA19.9(0.0)stableME19.9(0.0)watchMT19.2(0.0)stableMI18.8(0.0)stablePR5.9(0.0)stable

Track

National Infrastructure Track

Portfolio posture across schedule and budget risk. · 1,791 active projects.

National scope
Total capital$12.0B
On-time rate
99%
Budget risk
65%
Delayed2%
Sch. variance139d

Funding mix

1,791 projects•Tracked capital: $12,024,784,481

  • Funding mix unavailable

Big projects

Columbus City of - CS390274-0509$479MColumbus - FS390274-0516$109MCape Fear Public Utility Authority - CS370923-15$105MPittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority - 80254$63M
Open full Track

State comparison

All States

Score DateMay 19, 2026
Service Markets9,485
States Covered53
National Avg25.4
Elevated / Severe0 / 0

State Comparison

AK
30.2
ME
19.9
WA
27.2
ID
21.2
MT
19.2
ND
19.9
MN
26.7
WI
22.3
MI
18.8
NY
22.0
VT
20.1
NH
21.2
OR
27.5
UT
26.7
WY
20.6
SD
24.3
IA
22.8
IL
27.5
IN
22.7
OH
28.7
PA
31.5
NJ
31.4
CT
33.6
CA
21.7
NV
22.2
CO
25.2
NE
21.3
MO
29.3
KY
20.8
WV
29.6
VA
19.9
MD
25.9
DE
24.3
RI
26.3
HI
21.2
AZ
26.6
NM
31.5
KS
26.5
AR
24.3
TN
21.9
NC
25.1
SC
29.1
DC
28.5
MA
37.9
OK
32.6
LA
32.5
MS
27.0
AL
22.0
GA
19.9
TX
24.9
FL
28.7

Market Footprint vs Stress

Within-State Band Composition

State Explorer

StateAvg MISIBandDeltaMarketsSignalsTrend
MAMassachusetts37.9Watch0.02551638CTConnecticut33.6Watch0.057235OKOklahoma32.6Watch0.0148894LALouisiana32.5Watch0.02391444PAPennsylvania31.5Watch0.03572047NMNew Mexico31.5Watch0.075427NJNew Jersey31.4Watch0.02601478AKAlaska30.2Watch0.025130WVWest Virginia29.6Watch0.091551MOMissouri29.3Watch0.02101010SCSouth Carolina29.1Watch0.0155819OHOhio28.7Watch0.03321663FLFlorida28.7Watch0.03911945DCDistrict of Columbia28.5Watch0.0420OROregon27.5Watch0.0115599ILIllinois27.5Watch0.04522163WAWashington27.2Watch0.02371122MSMississippi27.0Watch0.02081095UTUtah26.7Watch0.0106524MNMinnesota26.7Watch0.0176820AZArizona26.6Watch0.0154720KSKansas26.5Watch0.090453RIRhode Island26.3Watch0.029143MDMaryland25.9Watch0.078399COColorado25.2Watch0.0174811NCNorth Carolina25.1Watch0.02761337TXTexas24.9Watch0.09874205ARArkansas24.3Watch0.0158738DEDelaware24.3Watch0.034150SDSouth Dakota24.3Watch0.045207IAIowa22.8Watch0.0131541INIndiana22.7Watch0.0211842WIWisconsin22.3Watch0.0195747NVNevada22.2Watch0.044187NYNew York22.0Watch0.03471511ALAlabama22.0Watch0.02891299TNTennessee21.9Watch0.02611044CACalifornia21.7Watch0.07112738NENebraska21.3Watch0.044189IDIdaho21.2Watch0.051212HIHawaii21.2Watch0.040143NHNew Hampshire21.2Watch0.042176KYKentucky20.8Stable0.02331055WYWyoming20.6Stable0.025111VTVermont20.1Stable0.031121GAGeorgia19.9Stable0.0236936NDNorth Dakota19.9Watch0.029113VAVirginia19.9Stable0.0162688MEMaine19.9Watch0.033129MTMontana19.2Stable0.038149MIMichigan18.8Stable0.03041082PRPuerto Rico5.9Stable0.04152

Insights

Biggest Movers

  1. MAMassachusetts0.0
  2. CTConnecticut0.0
  3. OKOklahoma0.0
  4. LALouisiana0.0
  5. PAPennsylvania0.0

Highest Signal Load

  1. TXTexas4205 signals
  2. CACalifornia2738 signals
  3. ILIllinois2163 signals
  4. PAPennsylvania2047 signals
  5. FLFlorida1945 signals

Most Volatile

  1. MAMassachusetts±0.0
  2. CTConnecticut±0.0
  3. OKOklahoma±0.0
  4. LALouisiana±0.0
  5. PAPennsylvania±0.0

Largest by Market Count

  1. TXTexas987 markets
  2. CACalifornia711 markets
  3. ILIllinois452 markets
  4. FLFlorida391 markets
  5. PAPennsylvania357 markets

Thinnest Coverage

  1. DCDistrict of Columbia4 markets
  2. AKAlaska25 markets
  3. WYWyoming25 markets
  4. RIRhode Island29 markets
  5. NDNorth Dakota29 markets

Methodology & Interpretation

  • State values are weighted averages of scored drinking-water service markets within each state. They are not full-population state stress estimates.
  • Coverage and confidence vary by state. States with fewer scored markets may have wider confidence bands.
  • Methodology upgrades can change comparative rank because saturated factors may be weighted differently. A lower rank after a methodology update is not, by itself, evidence of system improvement.
  • The headline composite is a blended structural stress measure. Use the component bars to separate infrastructure-heavy readings from socioeconomic or observability-heavy ones.
  • Scores are generated using the current MISI methodology. Version and vintage dates are noted in each score record.

Drinking Water Infrastructure Conditions Across U.S. States

This dataset tracks infrastructure stress across community drinking water systems in all U.S. states, enabling comparison of system conditions, trend behavior, and structural risk indicators over time.