MunimetricMunicipal Infrastructure Intelligence

States / Oregon

Oregon

Statewide Munimetric profile for Oregon, covering drinking-water market scores, signal activity, infrastructure stress context, and population insights across 115 scored service markets serving approximately 3.4 million people. This state profile highlights what is happening and why it matters using water-system, fiscal, capital, and signal context.

Oregon has an average MISI infrastructure stress score of 27.3/100 in the Watch band as of 2026-05-26. Public records summarize recent drinking-water violations, PFAS monitoring records, lead and copper context, and source-water mix across 115 covered systems. Updated May 2026.

National context

States sized by scored-market count. Color reflects average stress band.

115Markets scored
27.3Headline composite
~3.4MPop. served
577Active signals
Band distribution (MISI)

State headline composite

Component of current headline composite

Infrastructure Stress22.0 / 100

Physical, compliance, and capital-execution pressure reflected in the blended headline composite.

Socioeconomic Stress3.5 / 100

Affordability, demand-base, and parent-government fiscal pressure reflected in the blended headline composite.

Observability Stress1.8 / 100

Staleness, disclosure freshness, and reporting-visibility effects reflected in the blended headline composite.

27.3 headline compositeOregon state composite115 markets~3.4M people served
Portland Water Bureau50.7fragileLake Oswego Municipal Water49.4fragileClackamas River Water - Clackamas46.9fragileBeaverton, City of46.5fragileTualatin Valley Water District46.1fragileTigard, City of46.1fragileMolalla, City of44.5fragileSherwood, City of44.1fragileKernville-Gleneden-Linc Bch Wd43.2fragileMilwaukie, City of42.3fragileRivergrove Water District40.3fragileSunrise Water Authority40.3fragileBend Water Department39.8watchGresham Pwo-Water Section39.5watchRockwood Pud39.3watchClackamas River Water - Clairmont38.7watchCoos Bay North Bend Wtr Brd38.4watchLafayette, City of38.4watchWilsonville, City of38.1watchGladstone, City of37.6watchHillsboro, City of37.6watchThe Dalles, City of36.9watchRaleigh Water District36.7watchSalem Public Works36.1watchMount Angel, City of36.0watchForest Grove, City of35.6watchKlamath Falls Water Dept35.1watchRainbow Water District34.0watchCanby Utility33.3watchFairview, City of33.3watchSandy, City of33.3watchOak Lodge Water District33.3watchOregon City32.8watchCornelius, City of32.7watchTroutdale, City of32.5watchOntario, City of32.4watchUmatilla, City of32.0watchAumsville, City of31.7watchNewport, City of31.6watchMcminnville Water & Light31.6watchSheridan, City of31.5watchHermiston, City of31.3watchWest Slope Water District31.3watchTualatin, City of31.3watchGrants Pass, City of31.2watchMedford Water Commission31.2watchMyrtle Creek, City of31.2watchReedsport, City of31.0watchSpringfield Utility Board30.6watchIndependence Water System30.5watchPendleton, City of30.2watchMonmouth, City of30.2watchCottage Grove, City of29.6watchSt Helens, City of29.0watchSeal Rock Water District28.5watchUmpqua Basin Water Assoc28.0watchCreswell, City of27.7watchWest Linn, City of27.3watchDallas, City of27.0watchWinston-Dillard Water District26.9watchTillamook Water Dept, City of26.9watchRoberts Creek Water District26.8watchWarrenton, City of26.8watchStayton Water Supply26.8watchCoquille, City of26.0watchTalent, City of26.0watchHarrisburg, City of25.9watchJunction City Water Utilities25.6watchAlbany, City of25.5watchPrineville, City of25.4watchPhilomath Public Works25.3watchFlorence, City of25.0watchSilverton, City of25.0watchCorvallis, City of24.3watchMilton-Freewater, City of24.3watchHeceta Water District23.6watchEugene Water & Electric Board23.1watchSutherlin, City of22.7watchLebanon, City of22.3watchNewberg, City of22.2watchSeaside Water Department21.1watchKeizer, City of21.1watchAvion Water Co - Avion20.8watchAstoria, City of20.7watchTri-City Jw&sa20.6watchEagle Point, City of20.0stableOakridge, City of20.0stableWoodburn, City of20.0stableVeneta, City of19.7stableSweet Home, City of19.3stableIce Fountain Water District19.0stableRedmond Water Department18.8stableSuburban East Salem Wd18.4stableBrookings, City of18.3stableChenowith Pud17.5stableScappoose, City of17.5stableRoseburg, City of17.5stableMadras, City of16.9stableCentral Point, City of16.1stablePhoenix, City of16.1stableLincoln City Water District15.9stableAshland Water Department15.6stableHood River, City of15.2stableOregon Institute of Technology12.0stableBoardman, City of11.1stableCrystal Springs Water District11.1stableToledo Water Utilities10.8stableLa Grande, City of9.9stableBaker City7.6stableCreekside Development5.9stableCrooked River Ranch Wtr Co5.9stableOdot Hd Gettings Creek Rest Area5.9stableSpirit Mountain Casino4.0stableWarm Springs Water Treatment Plant3.0stableDeschutes Valley Water Dist3.0stablePortland Water Bureau50.7fragileLake Oswego Municipal Water49.4fragileClackamas River Water - Clackamas46.9fragileBeaverton, City of46.5fragileTualatin Valley Water District46.1fragileTigard, City of46.1fragileMolalla, City of44.5fragileSherwood, City of44.1fragileKernville-Gleneden-Linc Bch Wd43.2fragileMilwaukie, City of42.3fragileRivergrove Water District40.3fragileSunrise Water Authority40.3fragileBend Water Department39.8watchGresham Pwo-Water Section39.5watchRockwood Pud39.3watchClackamas River Water - Clairmont38.7watchCoos Bay North Bend Wtr Brd38.4watchLafayette, City of38.4watchWilsonville, City of38.1watchGladstone, City of37.6watchHillsboro, City of37.6watchThe Dalles, City of36.9watchRaleigh Water District36.7watchSalem Public Works36.1watchMount Angel, City of36.0watchForest Grove, City of35.6watchKlamath Falls Water Dept35.1watchRainbow Water District34.0watchCanby Utility33.3watchFairview, City of33.3watchSandy, City of33.3watchOak Lodge Water District33.3watchOregon City32.8watchCornelius, City of32.7watchTroutdale, City of32.5watchOntario, City of32.4watchUmatilla, City of32.0watchAumsville, City of31.7watchNewport, City of31.6watchMcminnville Water & Light31.6watchSheridan, City of31.5watchHermiston, City of31.3watchWest Slope Water District31.3watchTualatin, City of31.3watchGrants Pass, City of31.2watchMedford Water Commission31.2watchMyrtle Creek, City of31.2watchReedsport, City of31.0watchSpringfield Utility Board30.6watchIndependence Water System30.5watchPendleton, City of30.2watchMonmouth, City of30.2watchCottage Grove, City of29.6watchSt Helens, City of29.0watchSeal Rock Water District28.5watchUmpqua Basin Water Assoc28.0watchCreswell, City of27.7watchWest Linn, City of27.3watchDallas, City of27.0watchWinston-Dillard Water District26.9watchTillamook Water Dept, City of26.9watchRoberts Creek Water District26.8watchWarrenton, City of26.8watchStayton Water Supply26.8watchCoquille, City of26.0watchTalent, City of26.0watchHarrisburg, City of25.9watchJunction City Water Utilities25.6watchAlbany, City of25.5watchPrineville, City of25.4watchPhilomath Public Works25.3watchFlorence, City of25.0watchSilverton, City of25.0watchCorvallis, City of24.3watchMilton-Freewater, City of24.3watchHeceta Water District23.6watchEugene Water & Electric Board23.1watchSutherlin, City of22.7watchLebanon, City of22.3watchNewberg, City of22.2watchSeaside Water Department21.1watchKeizer, City of21.1watchAvion Water Co - Avion20.8watchAstoria, City of20.7watchTri-City Jw&sa20.6watchEagle Point, City of20.0stableOakridge, City of20.0stableWoodburn, City of20.0stableVeneta, City of19.7stableSweet Home, City of19.3stableIce Fountain Water District19.0stableRedmond Water Department18.8stableSuburban East Salem Wd18.4stableBrookings, City of18.3stableChenowith Pud17.5stableScappoose, City of17.5stableRoseburg, City of17.5stableMadras, City of16.9stableCentral Point, City of16.1stablePhoenix, City of16.1stableLincoln City Water District15.9stableAshland Water Department15.6stableHood River, City of15.2stableOregon Institute of Technology12.0stableBoardman, City of11.1stableCrystal Springs Water District11.1stableToledo Water Utilities10.8stableLa Grande, City of9.9stableBaker City7.6stableCreekside Development5.9stableCrooked River Ranch Wtr Co5.9stableOdot Hd Gettings Creek Rest Area5.9stableSpirit Mountain Casino4.0stableWarm Springs Water Treatment Plant3.0stableDeschutes Valley Water Dist3.0stable

Track

Oregon Infrastructure Track

Portfolio posture across schedule and budget risk. · 22 active projects.

State scope
Total capital$21M
On-time rate
100%
Budget risk
65%
Delayed0%
Sch. variance0d

Funding mix

22 projects•Tracked capital: $20,626,673

  • Funding mix unavailable

Big projects

City of Bay City - 130-10$4MCity of Coquille - 146-18$3MCity of Coquille - 146-18$3MRivergrove Water District - 876-05$3M
View project context

State interpretation guide

How to read Oregon headline composite

Plain-language summary

Oregon currently shows an average MISI headline composite of 27.3 versus a national average of 25.0. In v0.1.2, the headline composite remains a blended structural stress measure rather than a pure physical-condition index. A frozen national reference and a 50 percent single-factor cap reduce the dominance of near-universal and very rare factors, while the component bars continue to separate infrastructure, socioeconomic, and observability readings.

Why this page stands out

  • 115 scored systems are included in this state view, with explicit confidence and source-backed context.
  • State posture is benchmarked against national averages, not evaluated in isolation.
  • Top system links below connect state-level findings directly to profile-level diagnostics.

What to do next

  1. Review the executive context to understand the state-level pressure pattern.
  2. Open top system profiles to inspect what is actually driving stress at market level.
  3. Use saved monitoring after research access is enabled to follow high-stress systems over time.

Priority Oregon paths

Public record layer

Statewide Water Quality Context

Stored public-record context for recent drinking-water violations, contaminant monitoring, and source-water mix across covered systems. This is not a tap-water safety determination and does not change the MISI score.

Systems with recent violations
83 of 115Systems with recent public violation rows.
Source-water mix115 systems
  • Surface water83
  • Groundwater32
  • Purchased water0
  • Mixed source0
  • Not stored0

Latest identity snapshot: Dec 31, 2025

Coverage
  • Violation, enforcement, and compliance-burden counts use the recent 3 years window for dated stored records.
  • Drinking-water identity snapshots are stored for 110 of 115 included scored systems.
  • PFAS monitoring summary records are stored for 108 of 115 included systems; missing records are not treated as non-detections.
  • Lead and copper summary records are stored for 110 of 115 included systems; missing records are not treated as absence of lead/copper context.
Water quality questionsDefinitions and public-record context
How many covered systems in Oregon have recent recorded drinking-water violations?
Stored public records show 83 covered systems with recent drinking-water violations, with 1,239 recorded violations across 115 covered systems in the recent 3 years window.
How does Munimetric summarize PFAS public-record context in Oregon?
Stored contaminant-monitoring summaries are present for 108 covered systems; 24 systems have PFAS detection context in this state summary.
How does Munimetric summarize lead & copper context in Oregon?
Stored lead & copper summaries are present for 110 covered systems; 67 systems have violation or action-level context in this state summary.
What source-water types are represented across covered Oregon systems?
Stored identity records group covered Oregon systems by source-water type: Surface water: 83, Groundwater: 32.
Where can I find official drinking-water records for Oregon?
The Official records drawer lists Public drinking-water profile, Contaminant monitoring records links where currently available for Oregon.
Is this a real-time statewide tap-water condition rating?
No. This is not a real-time tap-water condition determination. Munimetric summarizes stored public-record context for research and navigation, and this layer does not change MISI.
Official records
Methodology/source notes
  • Methodology/source notesDisplayed from stored public drinking-water records and official program references. This layer does not change MISI.
  • Enforcement historyEPA ECHO / SDWIS: Violation and enforcement counts are aggregated from stored public compliance records across covered systems.
  • Contaminant monitoring recordsEPA UCMR: PFAS context uses stored contaminant-monitoring summaries where available; missing records are not treated as non-detections.
  • State drinking-water programOfficial link not currently stored for this state program mapping.
Top recent compliance-burden systemsRecent 3 years
SystemPopulationSource waterRecent violationsRecent enforcementPublic-record flags
Klamath Falls Water DeptOR410044340,475Groundwater20410recent violations recorded, recent enforcement history, recent monitoring/reporting failures, PFAS detections in stored records
Prineville, City OfOR410068211,000Groundwater13966recent violations recorded, recent enforcement history, recent monitoring/reporting failures, PFAS detections in stored records
Coquille, City OfOR41002133,953Surface water11222recent violations recorded, recent enforcement history, recent monitoring/reporting failures, lead/copper context
Harrisburg, City OfOR41003663,684Groundwater572recent violations recorded, recent enforcement history, recent monitoring/reporting failures, lead/copper context
Sheridan, City OfOR41008116,494Surface water4322recent violations recorded, recent enforcement history, recent monitoring/reporting failures, lead/copper context
Creswell, City OfOR41002465,585Surface water370recent violations recorded, recent monitoring/reporting failures, lead/copper context
Reedsport, City OfOR41006994,836Surface water3432recent violations recorded, recent enforcement history, recent monitoring/reporting failures, PFAS detections in stored records, lead/copper context
Grants Pass, City OfOR410034237,138Surface water334recent violations recorded, recent enforcement history, recent monitoring/reporting failures

This is not a real-time tap-water condition determination. For current advisories or health guidance, consult the utility or state drinking-water program.

Executive context

What This Page Shows

115 of the community drinking-water systems in Oregon are currently scored. Analytics below are calculated from this covered subset only. Covered systems serve approximately 3.4M people.

What the Data Suggests

Oregon has 115 scored service markets in the Munimetric coverage set, covering roughly 3.4 million residents in total. At the latest reading, the state-level average lands at 27.3 out of 100, indicating early but meaningful signs of structural stress in aggregate. A relatively small share — roughly 10% — currently sit in elevated-stress bands.

Across state markets, Operational Stress stands out as the dominant contributor to headline stress (14.1 points average), with Capex Pressure a distant second at 7.9. That pattern suggests a particular kind of pressure — concentrated rather than broadly distributed.

577 active signals are recorded across state markets. The most prevalent is Climate Hazard Exposure, affecting 104 markets.

State-level average stress has been relatively steady between recent observation periods, suggesting the current picture reflects persistent conditions rather than a sudden shift.

This summary is based on structured, source-backed public data and is intended for research and monitoring only. It is not investment advice, a credit opinion, or municipal advisory guidance.

Recent Movement

Latest average MISI is 27.3 as of May 26, 2026. Movement since May 24, 2026 is flat.

Compact summary from 46 stored state observations.

State Family Contribution Summary

Operational Stress14.1 / 20.0
Capex Pressure7.9 / 20.0
Revenue Fragility3.0 / 20.0
Governance Risk2.3 / 20.0
Rate Constraint0.0 / 20.0

Signals

Signal Frequency

SignalSeverityMarkets affected% of scored
Climate Hazard Exposurehigh10490%
Compliance Escalationhigh9280%
Current Drought Severityhigh9078%
Lead & Copper Rule Riskhigh6758%
Monitoring / Reporting Failuresmedium4337%
Utility Data Stalenesshigh3833%
High-AGI Out-Migrationhigh3732%
Housing Market Weaknessmedium3329%
Infrastructure Capital Gaphigh3026%
PFAS Contamination Riskhigh2421%
Parent-Government Fiscal Stresshigh1412%
Population Served Declinelow33%
Rapid Score Deteriorationmedium22%

Markets

Top Markets

#MarketScoreBandPopulationSignals
1Portland Water Bureau50.7Fragile666K9
2Lake Oswego Municipal Water49.4Fragile40K8
3Clackamas River Water - Clackamas46.9Fragile30K8
4Beaverton, City of46.5Fragile88K6
5Tualatin Valley Water District46.1Fragile225K7
6Tigard, City of46.1Fragile63K7
7Molalla, City of44.5Fragile10K8
8Sherwood, City of44.1Fragile20K7
9Kernville-Gleneden-Linc Bch Wd43.2Fragile6K6
10Milwaukie, City of42.3Fragile21K8
11Rivergrove Water District40.3Fragile4K8
12Sunrise Water Authority40.3Fragile50K7
13Bend Water Department39.8Watch78K8
14Gresham Pwo-Water Section39.5Watch74K8
15Rockwood Pud39.3Watch65K8
16Clackamas River Water - Clairmont38.7Watch20K7
17Coos Bay North Bend Wtr Brd38.4Watch35K7
18Lafayette, City of38.4Watch4K6
19Wilsonville, City of38.1Watch26K7
20Gladstone, City of37.6Watch12K6

Comparison

State Comparison

National average: 25.0

RankStateAvg ScoreBandMarketsDelta vs State
14District of Columbia28.5Watch4+1.2
15Illinois27.6Watch452+0.3
16Oregon27.3Watch115+0.0
17Washington27.1Watch237-0.2
18Mississippi26.9Watch208-0.4

Analytical posture

State Stress Analytics

Score Distribution

Distribution of scored market scores with the state average overlay.

Avg 27.3

115 markets plotted.

Stress vs Population

Each point is a scored market; tooltip reveals market-level context.

Portland Water Bureau Population: 666,200 Score: 50.7Lake Oswego Municipal Water Population: 40,000 Score: 49.4Clackamas River Water - Clackamas Population: 29,918 Score: 46.9Beaverton, City of Population: 88,045 Score: 46.5Tualatin Valley Water District Population: 224,600 Score: 46.1Tigard, City of Population: 62,500 Score: 46.1Molalla, City of Population: 10,298 Score: 44.5Sherwood, City of Population: 19,885 Score: 44.1Kernville-Gleneden-Linc Bch Wd Population: 5,609 Score: 43.2Milwaukie, City of Population: 20,946 Score: 42.3Rivergrove Water District Population: 4,000 Score: 40.3Sunrise Water Authority Population: 50,003 Score: 40.3Bend Water Department Population: 77,704 Score: 39.8Gresham Pwo-Water Section Population: 73,932 Score: 39.5Rockwood Pud Population: 65,443 Score: 39.3Clackamas River Water - Clairmont Population: 19,928 Score: 38.7Coos Bay North Bend Wtr Brd Population: 34,500 Score: 38.4Lafayette, City of Population: 4,423 Score: 38.4Wilsonville, City of Population: 25,915 Score: 38.1Gladstone, City of Population: 12,121 Score: 37.6Hillsboro, City of Population: 92,632 Score: 37.6The Dalles, City of Population: 13,010 Score: 36.9Raleigh Water District Population: 4,500 Score: 36.7Salem Public Works Population: 199,820 Score: 36.1Mount Angel, City of Population: 3,650 Score: 36.0Forest Grove, City of Population: 26,838 Score: 35.6Klamath Falls Water Dept Population: 40,475 Score: 35.1Rainbow Water District Population: 6,300 Score: 34.0Canby Utility Population: 18,754 Score: 33.3Fairview, City of Population: 9,963 Score: 33.3Sandy, City of Population: 12,991 Score: 33.3Oak Lodge Water District Population: 30,000 Score: 33.3Oregon City Population: 33,940 Score: 32.8Cornelius, City of Population: 14,490 Score: 32.7Troutdale, City of Population: 16,185 Score: 32.5Ontario, City of Population: 14,465 Score: 32.4Umatilla, City of Population: 8,256 Score: 32.0Aumsville, City of Population: 4,125 Score: 31.7Newport, City of Population: 10,160 Score: 31.6Mcminnville Water & Light Population: 34,515 Score: 31.6Sheridan, City of Population: 6,494 Score: 31.5Hermiston, City of Population: 20,000 Score: 31.3West Slope Water District Population: 11,000 Score: 31.3Tualatin, City of Population: 28,106 Score: 31.3Grants Pass, City of Population: 37,138 Score: 31.2Medford Water Commission Population: 106,068 Score: 31.2Myrtle Creek, City of Population: 3,501 Score: 31.2Reedsport, City of Population: 4,836 Score: 31.0Springfield Utility Board Population: 62,100 Score: 30.6Independence Water System Population: 10,300 Score: 30.5Pendleton, City of Population: 16,996 Score: 30.2Monmouth, City of Population: 11,651 Score: 30.2Cottage Grove, City of Population: 10,879 Score: 29.6St Helens, City of Population: 13,410 Score: 29.0Seal Rock Water District Population: 6,000 Score: 28.5Umpqua Basin Water Assoc Population: 9,499 Score: 28.0Creswell, City of Population: 5,585 Score: 27.7West Linn, City of Population: 28,000 Score: 27.3Dallas, City of Population: 17,911 Score: 27.0Winston-Dillard Water District Population: 8,300 Score: 26.9Tillamook Water Dept, City of Population: 5,265 Score: 26.9Roberts Creek Water District Population: 7,000 Score: 26.8Warrenton, City of Population: 9,100 Score: 26.8Stayton Water Supply Population: 8,400 Score: 26.8Coquille, City of Population: 3,953 Score: 26.0Talent, City of Population: 6,293 Score: 26.0Harrisburg, City of Population: 3,684 Score: 25.9Junction City Water Utilities Population: 7,000 Score: 25.6Albany, City of Population: 57,997 Score: 25.5Prineville, City of Population: 11,000 Score: 25.4Philomath Public Works Population: 4,670 Score: 25.3Florence, City of Population: 9,561 Score: 25.0Silverton, City of Population: 10,484 Score: 25.0Corvallis, City of Population: 61,468 Score: 24.3Milton-Freewater, City of Population: 7,145 Score: 24.3Heceta Water District Population: 4,921 Score: 23.6Eugene Water & Electric Board Population: 176,000 Score: 23.1Sutherlin, City of Population: 8,060 Score: 22.7Lebanon, City of Population: 18,945 Score: 22.3Newberg, City of Population: 25,138 Score: 22.2Seaside Water Department Population: 7,482 Score: 21.1Keizer, City of Population: 38,585 Score: 21.1Avion Water Co - Avion Population: 35,332 Score: 20.8Astoria, City of Population: 10,181 Score: 20.7Tri-City Jw&sa Population: 3,500 Score: 20.6Eagle Point, City of Population: 9,554 Score: 20.0Oakridge, City of Population: 3,310 Score: 20.0Woodburn, City of Population: 29,455 Score: 20.0Veneta, City of Population: 5,200 Score: 19.7Sweet Home, City of Population: 10,322 Score: 19.3Ice Fountain Water District Population: 6,000 Score: 19.0Redmond Water Department Population: 37,566 Score: 18.8Suburban East Salem Wd Population: 13,900 Score: 18.4Brookings, City of Population: 7,120 Score: 18.3Chenowith Pud Population: 4,500 Score: 17.5Scappoose, City of Population: 8,710 Score: 17.5Roseburg, City of Population: 28,800 Score: 17.5Madras, City of Population: 3,940 Score: 16.9Central Point, City of Population: 19,785 Score: 16.1Phoenix, City of Population: 5,900 Score: 16.1Lincoln City Water District Population: 20,830 Score: 15.9Ashland Water Department Population: 20,946 Score: 15.6Hood River, City of Population: 8,577 Score: 15.2Oregon Institute of Technology Population: 3,315 Score: 12.0Boardman, City of Population: 5,749 Score: 11.1Crystal Springs Water District Population: 5,973 Score: 11.1Toledo Water Utilities Population: 3,645 Score: 10.8La Grande, City of Population: 13,460 Score: 9.9Baker City Population: 10,349 Score: 7.6Creekside Development Population: 9,201 Score: 5.9Crooked River Ranch Wtr Co Population: 4,000 Score: 5.9Odot Hd Gettings Creek Rest Area Population: 3,500 Score: 5.9Spirit Mountain Casino Population: 7,745 Score: 4.0Warm Springs Water Treatment Plant Population: 3,800 Score: 3.0Deschutes Valley Water Dist Population: 11,700 Score: 3.0MISI score (0-100)Population served (log scale)

115 markets plotted.

Population View

People served by community water systems in Oregon, colored by stress band.

~3.4M people served by 115 systems in Oregon

Stable
Watch
Fragile
High Stress
Critical

115 scored systems · colored by stress band

Peer Constellation

Select a market to see its nearest peers by score similarity.

24 nearest peers by score distance.

Score Trend

Latest

27.3

Trend

+20.1

Observations

46

Mar 18, 2026 · 7.3Mar 20, 2026 · 7.3Mar 21, 2026 · 7.3Mar 22, 2026 · 7.3Mar 24, 2026 · 7.7Mar 25, 2026 · 10.4Mar 29, 2026 · 10.4Apr 2, 2026 · 12.9Apr 3, 2026 · 13.7Apr 4, 2026 · 13.7Apr 5, 2026 · 13.5Apr 6, 2026 · 27.7Apr 7, 2026 · 27.7Apr 8, 2026 · 28.3Apr 9, 2026 · 28.3Apr 10, 2026 · 28.4Apr 13, 2026 · 28.4Apr 14, 2026 · 28.4Apr 18, 2026 · 28.4Apr 19, 2026 · 28.4Apr 21, 2026 · 28.4Apr 22, 2026 · 28.4Apr 23, 2026 · 28.4Apr 24, 2026 · 28.4Apr 25, 2026 · 28.6Apr 26, 2026 · 27.1Apr 27, 2026 · 27.1Apr 28, 2026 · 27.1Apr 29, 2026 · 27.1Apr 30, 2026 · 27.1May 1, 2026 · 27.1May 2, 2026 · 27.0May 3, 2026 · 27.0May 4, 2026 · 27.1May 5, 2026 · 27.1May 6, 2026 · 27.1May 7, 2026 · 27.1May 8, 2026 · 27.1May 9, 2026 · 27.1May 10, 2026 · 27.1May 17, 2026 · 27.5May 19, 2026 · 27.5May 21, 2026 · 27.5May 22, 2026 · 27.3May 24, 2026 · 27.3May 26, 2026 · 27.3Mar 18, 2026May 26, 2026

Extended layers

Advanced State Context

Priority views, detailed registers, and methodology supporting the analytical core above.

Markets & signals

Priority Views

#MarketScoreBandPopulationSignals
1Portland Water Bureau50.7Fragile666K9
2Lake Oswego Municipal Water49.4Fragile40K8
3Clackamas River Water - Clackamas46.9Fragile30K8
4Beaverton, City of46.5Fragile88K6
5Tualatin Valley Water District46.1Fragile225K7
6Tigard, City of46.1Fragile63K7
7Molalla, City of44.5Fragile10K8
8Sherwood, City of44.1Fragile20K7
9Kernville-Gleneden-Linc Bch Wd43.2Fragile6K6
10Milwaukie, City of42.3Fragile21K8
11Rivergrove Water District40.3Fragile4K8
12Sunrise Water Authority40.3Fragile50K7
13Bend Water Department39.8Watch78K8
14Gresham Pwo-Water Section39.5Watch74K8
15Rockwood Pud39.3Watch65K8
16Clackamas River Water - Clairmont38.7Watch20K7
17Coos Bay North Bend Wtr Brd38.4Watch35K7
18Lafayette, City of38.4Watch4K6
19Wilsonville, City of38.1Watch26K7
20Gladstone, City of37.6Watch12K6

Detailed records

Registers

#MarketScoreBandPopulationSignals
1Portland Water Bureau50.7Fragile666K9
2Lake Oswego Municipal Water49.4Fragile40K8
3Clackamas River Water - Clackamas46.9Fragile30K8
4Beaverton, City of46.5Fragile88K6
5Tualatin Valley Water District46.1Fragile225K7
6Tigard, City of46.1Fragile63K7
7Molalla, City of44.5Fragile10K8
8Sherwood, City of44.1Fragile20K7
9Kernville-Gleneden-Linc Bch Wd43.2Fragile6K6
10Milwaukie, City of42.3Fragile21K8
11Rivergrove Water District40.3Fragile4K8
12Sunrise Water Authority40.3Fragile50K7
13Bend Water Department39.8Watch78K8
14Gresham Pwo-Water Section39.5Watch74K8
15Rockwood Pud39.3Watch65K8
16Clackamas River Water - Clairmont38.7Watch20K7
17Coos Bay North Bend Wtr Brd38.4Watch35K7
18Lafayette, City of38.4Watch4K6
19Wilsonville, City of38.1Watch26K7
20Gladstone, City of37.6Watch12K6

Keep monitoring this state

Research access covers saved monitoring, alerts, recurring briefs, and team review.

Get the Water Stress BriefRequest research access

Water Infrastructure in Oregon

Munimetric tracks infrastructure stress across 115 community drinking-water systems in Oregon. Each system receives a Munimetric Infrastructure Stress Index (MISI) score from 0 to 100, calculated across five risk families: Operational Stress, Capex Pressure, Revenue Fragility, Rate Constraint, and Governance Risk. Higher scores indicate more structural stress. Scores are source-backed and deterministic, drawing from EPA SDWA compliance records, American Community Survey demographic and economic data, FEMA National Risk Index hazard profiles, and state financial disclosures.

State-level monitoring shows which systems face the highest structural stress, how Oregon compares against other states nationally, and which monitoring signals are most active across the state. Each individual system profile includes compliance history, score family drivers, peer rankings within population-based cohorts where safeguards pass, and public source context. Full provenance cards and source workbench views remain workflow-gated. Munimetric covers community water systems across all 50 states and territories. This is structural risk research—not a water quality rating, advisory feed, or credit rating. Updated May 2026.

The statewide public-record layer adds drinking-water violation categories, PFAS monitoring summaries where stored, lead and copper context, source-water mix, and official record links across covered systems. These records help explain water-system context alongside infrastructure stress without turning Munimetric into a tap-water safety determination.

What is the Munimetric score for Oregon?
Munimetric assigns a state-level average MISI score based on the individual scores of all covered community water systems in Oregon. The state average, band distribution, and market-level rankings are shown on this page. Higher MISI values indicate greater structural stress.
Which water systems in Oregon face the most infrastructure stress?
The state page ranks the highest-stress systems in Oregon by MISI score. Stress reflects operational burden, capital gaps, revenue fragility, rate affordability constraints, and governance risk, not a single compliance event. The headline remains a blended structural stress composite rather than a pure physical-condition index. Workflow actions remain reserved for account access.
How does Oregon compare to other states for drinking water infrastructure risk?
Oregon is compared against all 50 states and territories using average MISI score, market count, and band distribution. Munimetric tracks nationwide coverage across 9,000+ scored service markets.
Are there lead pipe or corrosion-related concerns in Oregon water systems?
Where lead and copper rule compliance data is available from EPA SDWA records, Munimetric factors it into the Operational Stress family score. Specific lead service line inventories vary by system. Individual system profiles contain the most detailed compliance context available.
Does Munimetric include PFAS monitoring context for Oregon water systems?
Munimetric summarizes stored PFAS monitoring context where public contaminant-monitoring records are available. Missing PFAS summaries remain missing records, not non-detections, and this public-record layer does not change the MISI score by itself.
What compliance signals are active in Oregon?
Munimetric tracks signals such as compliance escalation, monitoring and reporting failures, population decline, income erosion, data staleness, and parent-government fiscal stress across Oregon water systems.
Does Munimetric track boil water advisories in Oregon?
Munimetric does not track real-time boil water advisories. For current advisories, contact your local water utility or state drinking water program. Munimetric monitors structural conditions that provide context around system reliability over time.