MunimetricMunicipal Infrastructure Intelligence

States / Utah

Utah

Explore Utah drinking-water system scores, stress signals, infrastructure risk, and statewide market context across 106 scored service markets serving approximately 3.4 million people. This state profile highlights what is happening and why it matters using water-system, fiscal, capital, and signal context.

Utah has an average MISI infrastructure stress score of 26.6/100 in the Watch band as of 2026-08-16. Public records summarize recent drinking-water violations, PFAS monitoring records, lead and copper context, and source-water mix across 106 covered systems. Updated May 2026.

National context

States sized by scored-market count. Color reflects average stress band.

106Markets scored
26.6Headline composite
~3.4MPop. served
521Active signals
Band distribution (MISI)

State headline composite

Component of current headline composite

Infrastructure Stress23.6 / 100

Physical, compliance, and capital-execution pressure reflected in the blended headline composite.

Socioeconomic Stress3.0 / 100

Affordability, demand-base, and parent-government fiscal pressure reflected in the blended headline composite.

Observability Stress0.0 / 100

Staleness, disclosure freshness, and reporting-visibility effects reflected in the blended headline composite.

26.6 headline compositeUtah state composite106 markets~3.4M people served
Murray City Water System44.2fragileMidvale City Water System43.5fragileWest Jordan City Water System41.3fragileHolliday Water Company40.5fragileSouth Salt Lake City Water System40.5fragileCedar City Waterworks39.1watchNorth Salt Lake City Water System38.9watchSouth Davis Water District37.9watchHerriman City Municipal Water Department37.6watchSalt Lake City Water System37.2watchNorth Logan City37.0watchClearfield City Water System36.9watchWellsville City Water System36.4watchSandy City Water System36.3watchBountiful City Water System35.9watchKearns Improvement District35.6watchBluffdale Water System35.5watchWaterpro Inc35.5watchTaylorsville-Bennion Id35.5watchDraper City Water System34.7watchProvo City34.5watchHildale - Colorado City34.0watchEnoch City Water System33.7watchPark City Water System33.3watchBrigham City Water System33.0watchEagle Mountain City33.0watchSmithfield City32.5watchRoosevelt City Water System32.4watchGranger-Hunter Improvement District32.2watchWoods Cross City Water System32.0watchNibley City Water32.0watchCenterville City Water System30.9watchSyracuse City Water System30.9watchSaratoga Springs City30.8watchTooele City Water System30.6watchJordan Valley Wcd30.3watchSpringville City30.1watchFarmington City Water System30.0watchHyde Park City Water System29.5watchWhite City Wid29.3watchGrantsville City29.3watchSouth Weber Water System29.0watchPrice River Wid28.8watchBlanding City28.8watchSouth Jordan City28.6watchWashington Terrace City Water System28.3watchSantaquin City28.0watchSpanish Fork City28.0watchAmerican Fork City28.0watchLehi City28.0watchHurricane City28.0watchLa Verkin City Water System28.0watchSt George City Water System28.0watchSanta Clara City28.0watchWashington City28.0watchHill Air Force Base27.3watchKaysville City Water System27.3watchSunset City Water System27.3watchMagna Water Co and Improvment District26.7watchRiverton City Water System26.7watchPrice Municipal Corporation26.5watchGorgoza Mutual Water Co26.4watchFruit Heights City Water System25.9watchMountain Regional Water Ssd25.3watchOrem City Water System25.1watchHighland City25.0watchRoy City Water System24.4watchClinton City Water System24.0watchOgden City Water System24.0watchHeber City Water System23.9watchRichfield City23.8watchCedar Hills Town Water System23.7watchTremonton City23.3watchIvins23.1watchPleasant View Culinary Water22.9watchHooper Water Improvement District22.4watchSummit Water Distribution22.1watchPerry City21.7watchMidway City Water System21.5watchWest Bountiful City Water System21.3watchLayton City Water System21.3watchWest Point City Water System21.3watchHyrum City21.1watchNorth Ogden City20.9watchSouth Ogden City Water System20.3watchPleasant Grove City20.1watchSalem City20.0stableMapleton City20.0stablePayson City Water System20.0stableLindon City19.1stableLogan City Water System18.6stableStansbury Park Improvement District17.4stableRiverdale City Water System16.4stableTaylor-West Weber Wid16.4stableAlpine City16.2stableKanab City15.9stableAshley Valley Water and Sewer Id12.9stableProvidence City Water System10.6stableUtah State University10.6stableMoab City7.9stableGrand Water and Sewer Agency7.9stableNephi City7.9stableEphraim City7.9stableVernal City Water System7.9stableJordanelle Ssd7.9stableBona Vista Water District5.9stableMurray City Water System44.2fragileMidvale City Water System43.5fragileWest Jordan City Water System41.3fragileHolliday Water Company40.5fragileSouth Salt Lake City Water System40.5fragileCedar City Waterworks39.1watchNorth Salt Lake City Water System38.9watchSouth Davis Water District37.9watchHerriman City Municipal Water Department37.6watchSalt Lake City Water System37.2watchNorth Logan City37.0watchClearfield City Water System36.9watchWellsville City Water System36.4watchSandy City Water System36.3watchBountiful City Water System35.9watchKearns Improvement District35.6watchBluffdale Water System35.5watchWaterpro Inc35.5watchTaylorsville-Bennion Id35.5watchDraper City Water System34.7watchProvo City34.5watchHildale - Colorado City34.0watchEnoch City Water System33.7watchPark City Water System33.3watchBrigham City Water System33.0watchEagle Mountain City33.0watchSmithfield City32.5watchRoosevelt City Water System32.4watchGranger-Hunter Improvement District32.2watchWoods Cross City Water System32.0watchNibley City Water32.0watchCenterville City Water System30.9watchSyracuse City Water System30.9watchSaratoga Springs City30.8watchTooele City Water System30.6watchJordan Valley Wcd30.3watchSpringville City30.1watchFarmington City Water System30.0watchHyde Park City Water System29.5watchWhite City Wid29.3watchGrantsville City29.3watchSouth Weber Water System29.0watchPrice River Wid28.8watchBlanding City28.8watchSouth Jordan City28.6watchWashington Terrace City Water System28.3watchSantaquin City28.0watchSpanish Fork City28.0watchAmerican Fork City28.0watchLehi City28.0watchHurricane City28.0watchLa Verkin City Water System28.0watchSt George City Water System28.0watchSanta Clara City28.0watchWashington City28.0watchHill Air Force Base27.3watchKaysville City Water System27.3watchSunset City Water System27.3watchMagna Water Co and Improvment District26.7watchRiverton City Water System26.7watchPrice Municipal Corporation26.5watchGorgoza Mutual Water Co26.4watchFruit Heights City Water System25.9watchMountain Regional Water Ssd25.3watchOrem City Water System25.1watchHighland City25.0watchRoy City Water System24.4watchClinton City Water System24.0watchOgden City Water System24.0watchHeber City Water System23.9watchRichfield City23.8watchCedar Hills Town Water System23.7watchTremonton City23.3watchIvins23.1watchPleasant View Culinary Water22.9watchHooper Water Improvement District22.4watchSummit Water Distribution22.1watchPerry City21.7watchMidway City Water System21.5watchWest Bountiful City Water System21.3watchLayton City Water System21.3watchWest Point City Water System21.3watchHyrum City21.1watchNorth Ogden City20.9watchSouth Ogden City Water System20.3watchPleasant Grove City20.1watchSalem City20.0stableMapleton City20.0stablePayson City Water System20.0stableLindon City19.1stableLogan City Water System18.6stableStansbury Park Improvement District17.4stableRiverdale City Water System16.4stableTaylor-West Weber Wid16.4stableAlpine City16.2stableKanab City15.9stableAshley Valley Water and Sewer Id12.9stableProvidence City Water System10.6stableUtah State University10.6stableMoab City7.9stableGrand Water and Sewer Agency7.9stableNephi City7.9stableEphraim City7.9stableVernal City Water System7.9stableJordanelle Ssd7.9stableBona Vista Water District5.9stable

Track

Utah Infrastructure Track

Portfolio posture across schedule and budget risk. · 5 active projects.

State scope
Total capital$53M
On-time rate
100%
Budget risk
65%
Delayed0%
Sch. variance0d

Funding mix

5 projects•Tracked capital: $52,992,000

  • Funding mix unavailable

Big projects

Ogden City - 3F1908$34MProvo City - 3F2175$8MProvo City - 3F2175$8MSkyline Mountain SSD - 3F1831$3M
View project context

State interpretation guide

How to read Utah headline composite

Plain-language summary

Utah currently shows an average MISI headline composite of 26.6 versus a national average of 24.4. In v0.1.2, the headline composite remains a blended structural stress measure rather than a pure physical-condition index. A frozen national reference and a 50 percent single-factor cap reduce the dominance of near-universal and very rare factors, while the component bars continue to separate infrastructure, socioeconomic, and observability readings.

Why this page stands out

  • 106 scored systems are included in this state view, with explicit confidence and source-backed context.
  • State posture is benchmarked against national averages, not evaluated in isolation.
  • Top system links below connect state-level findings directly to profile-level diagnostics.

What to do next

  1. Review the executive context to understand the state-level pressure pattern.
  2. Open top system profiles to inspect what is actually driving stress at market level.
  3. Use saved monitoring after research access is enabled to follow high-stress systems over time.

Priority Utah paths

Public record layer

Statewide Water Quality Context

Stored public-record context for recent drinking-water violations, contaminant monitoring, and source-water mix across covered systems. This is not a tap-water safety determination and does not change the MISI score.

Systems with recent violations
45 of 106Systems with recent public violation rows.
Source-water mix106 systems
  • Surface water63
  • Groundwater43
  • Purchased water0
  • Mixed source0
  • Not stored0

Latest identity snapshot: Jun 30, 2026

Coverage
  • Violation, enforcement, and compliance-burden counts use the recent 3 years window for dated stored records.
  • Drinking-water identity snapshots are stored for 105 of 106 included scored systems.
  • PFAS monitoring summary records are stored for 105 of 106 included systems; missing records are not treated as non-detections.
  • Lead and copper summary records are stored for 105 of 106 included systems; missing records are not treated as absence of lead/copper context.
Water quality questionsDefinitions and public-record context
How many covered systems in Utah have recent recorded drinking-water violations?
Stored public records show 45 covered systems with recent drinking-water violations, with 577 recorded violations across 106 covered systems in the recent 3 years window.
How does Munimetric summarize PFAS public-record context in Utah?
Stored contaminant-monitoring summaries are present for 105 covered systems; 81 systems have PFAS detection context in this state summary.
How does Munimetric summarize lead & copper context in Utah?
Stored lead & copper summaries are present for 105 covered systems; 47 systems have violation or action-level context in this state summary.
What source-water types are represented across covered Utah systems?
Stored identity records group covered Utah systems by source-water type: Surface water: 63, Groundwater: 43.
Where can I find official drinking-water records for Utah?
The Official records drawer lists Public drinking-water profile, Contaminant monitoring records links where currently available for Utah.
Is this a real-time statewide tap-water condition rating?
No. This is not a real-time tap-water condition determination. Munimetric summarizes stored public-record context for research and navigation, and this layer does not change MISI.
Official records
Methodology/source notes
  • Methodology/source notesDisplayed from stored public drinking-water records and official program references. This layer does not change MISI.
  • Enforcement historyEPA ECHO / SDWIS: Violation and enforcement counts are aggregated from stored public compliance records across covered systems.
  • Contaminant monitoring recordsEPA UCMR: PFAS context uses stored contaminant-monitoring summaries where available; missing records are not treated as non-detections.
  • State drinking-water programOfficial link not currently stored for this state program mapping.
Top recent compliance-burden systemsRecent 3 years
SystemPopulationSource waterRecent violationsRecent enforcementPublic-record flags
Enoch City Water SystemUTAH110046,500Groundwater10635recent violations recorded, recent enforcement history, recent monitoring/reporting failures, PFAS detections in stored records, lead/copper context
Tooele City Water SystemUTAH2300437,100Groundwater10218recent violations recorded, recent enforcement history, recent monitoring/reporting failures, PFAS detections in stored records, lead/copper context
Grantsville CityUTAH2300216,284Groundwater5412recent violations recorded, recent enforcement history, recent monitoring/reporting failures, PFAS detections in stored records
Smithfield CityUTAH0302010,223Groundwater5411recent violations recorded, recent enforcement history, recent monitoring/reporting failures, PFAS detections in stored records, lead/copper context
Lehi CityUTAH2501593,446Surface water4912recent violations recorded, recent enforcement history, recent monitoring/reporting failures, PFAS detections in stored records
Blanding CityUTAH190013,760Surface water4412recent violations recorded, recent enforcement history, recent monitoring/reporting failures, lead/copper context
Bountiful City Water SystemUTAH0601537,500Surface water426recent violations recorded, recent enforcement history, recent monitoring/reporting failures, PFAS detections in stored records, lead/copper context
Hildale - Colorado CityUTAH270066,100Groundwater1019recent violations recorded, recent enforcement history, recent monitoring/reporting failures, PFAS detections in stored records, lead/copper context

This is not a real-time tap-water condition determination. For current advisories or health guidance, consult the utility or state drinking-water program.

Executive context

What This Page Shows

106 of the community drinking-water systems in Utah are currently scored. Analytics below are calculated from this covered subset only. Covered systems serve approximately 3.4M people.

What the Data Suggests

Utah has 106 scored service markets in the Munimetric coverage set, covering roughly 3.4 million residents in total. At the latest reading, the state-level average lands at 26.6 out of 100, indicating early but meaningful signs of structural stress in aggregate. A relatively small share — roughly 5% — currently sit in elevated-stress bands.

Across state markets, Operational Stress stands out as the dominant contributor to headline stress (15.0 points average), with Capex Pressure a distant second at 8.6. That pattern suggests a particular kind of pressure — concentrated rather than broadly distributed.

521 active signals are recorded across state markets. The most prevalent is Current Drought Severity, affecting 106 markets.

State-level average stress has been relatively steady between recent observation periods, suggesting the current picture reflects persistent conditions rather than a sudden shift.

This summary is based on structured, source-backed public data and is intended for research and monitoring only. It is not investment advice, a credit opinion, or municipal advisory guidance.

Recent Movement

Latest average MISI is 26.6 as of Aug 16, 2026. Movement since Aug 15, 2026 is flat.

Compact summary from 94 stored state observations.

State Family Contribution Summary

Operational Stress15.0 / 20.0
Capex Pressure8.6 / 20.0
Revenue Fragility2.4 / 20.0
Governance Risk0.6 / 20.0
Rate Constraint0.0 / 20.0

Signals

Signal Frequency

SignalSeverityMarkets affected% of scored
Current Drought Severityhigh106100%
Climate Hazard Exposurehigh9186%
PFAS Contamination Riskhigh8176%
Compliance Escalationhigh8176%
Lead & Copper Rule Riskhigh4744%
High-AGI Out-Migrationhigh4643%
Monitoring / Reporting Failuresmedium2423%
Parent-Government Fiscal Stressmedium2120%
Housing Market Weaknesslow1918%
Infrastructure Capital Gaplow44%
Population Served Declinemedium11%

Markets

Top Markets

#MarketScoreBandPopulationSignals
1Murray City Water System44.2Fragile39K8
2Midvale City Water System43.5Fragile33K7
3West Jordan City Water System41.3Fragile117K8
4Holliday Water Company40.5Fragile15K7
5South Salt Lake City Water System40.5Fragile24K8
6Cedar City Waterworks39.1Watch40K6
7North Salt Lake City Water System38.9Watch19K7
8South Davis Water District37.9Watch11K7
9Herriman City Municipal Water Department37.6Watch60K7
10Salt Lake City Water System37.2Watch384K8
11North Logan City37.0Watch9K7
12Clearfield City Water System36.9Watch34K7
13Wellsville City Water System36.4Watch4K6
14Sandy City Water System36.3Watch100K7
15Bountiful City Water System35.9Watch38K7
16Kearns Improvement District35.6Watch57K7
17Bluffdale Water System35.5Watch20K6
18Waterpro Inc35.5Watch33K6
19Taylorsville-Bennion Id35.5Watch67K6
20Draper City Water System34.7Watch23K6

Comparison

State Comparison

National average: 24.4

RankStateAvg ScoreBandMarketsDelta vs State
17Ohio27.3Watch332+0.7
18South Carolina27.0Watch155+0.3
19Utah26.6Watch106+0.0
20Kansas26.6Watch90-0.0
21District of Columbia26.5Stable4-0.1

Analytical posture

State Stress Analytics

Score Distribution

Distribution of scored market scores with the state average overlay.

Avg 26.6

106 markets plotted.

Stress vs Population

Each point is a scored market; tooltip reveals market-level context.

Murray City Water System Population: 38,723 Score: 44.2Midvale City Water System Population: 33,005 Score: 43.5West Jordan City Water System Population: 117,025 Score: 41.3Holliday Water Company Population: 15,000 Score: 40.5South Salt Lake City Water System Population: 23,600 Score: 40.5Cedar City Waterworks Population: 39,670 Score: 39.1North Salt Lake City Water System Population: 18,655 Score: 38.9South Davis Water District Population: 10,565 Score: 37.9Herriman City Municipal Water Department Population: 60,000 Score: 37.6Salt Lake City Water System Population: 383,612 Score: 37.2North Logan City Population: 8,500 Score: 37.0Clearfield City Water System Population: 33,540 Score: 36.9Wellsville City Water System Population: 4,190 Score: 36.4Sandy City Water System Population: 99,750 Score: 36.3Bountiful City Water System Population: 37,500 Score: 35.9Kearns Improvement District Population: 56,700 Score: 35.6Bluffdale Water System Population: 20,000 Score: 35.5Waterpro Inc Population: 33,100 Score: 35.5Taylorsville-Bennion Id Population: 67,098 Score: 35.5Draper City Water System Population: 23,205 Score: 34.7Provo City Population: 116,288 Score: 34.5Hildale - Colorado City Population: 6,100 Score: 34.0Enoch City Water System Population: 6,500 Score: 33.7Park City Water System Population: 8,875 Score: 33.3Brigham City Water System Population: 20,540 Score: 33.0Eagle Mountain City Population: 61,266 Score: 33.0Smithfield City Population: 10,223 Score: 32.5Roosevelt City Water System Population: 8,000 Score: 32.4Granger-Hunter Improvement District Population: 121,083 Score: 32.2Woods Cross City Water System Population: 13,110 Score: 32.0Nibley City Water Population: 9,200 Score: 32.0Centerville City Water System Population: 17,155 Score: 30.9Syracuse City Water System Population: 35,561 Score: 30.9Saratoga Springs City Population: 68,000 Score: 30.8Tooele City Water System Population: 37,100 Score: 30.6Jordan Valley Wcd Population: 99,335 Score: 30.3Springville City Population: 35,516 Score: 30.1Farmington City Water System Population: 27,860 Score: 30.0Hyde Park City Water System Population: 5,200 Score: 29.5White City Wid Population: 15,800 Score: 29.3Grantsville City Population: 16,284 Score: 29.3South Weber Water System Population: 8,125 Score: 29.0Price River Wid Population: 5,790 Score: 28.8Blanding City Population: 3,760 Score: 28.8South Jordan City Population: 89,704 Score: 28.6Washington Terrace City Water System Population: 9,260 Score: 28.3Santaquin City Population: 17,532 Score: 28.0Spanish Fork City Population: 47,169 Score: 28.0American Fork City Population: 39,045 Score: 28.0Lehi City Population: 93,446 Score: 28.0Hurricane City Population: 25,555 Score: 28.0La Verkin City Water System Population: 4,500 Score: 28.0St George City Water System Population: 105,240 Score: 28.0Santa Clara City Population: 9,000 Score: 28.0Washington City Population: 45,865 Score: 28.0Hill Air Force Base Population: 25,625 Score: 27.3Kaysville City Water System Population: 32,976 Score: 27.3Sunset City Water System Population: 5,300 Score: 27.3Magna Water Co and Improvment District Population: 32,100 Score: 26.7Riverton City Water System Population: 45,600 Score: 26.7Price Municipal Corporation Population: 8,867 Score: 26.5Gorgoza Mutual Water Co Population: 4,305 Score: 26.4Fruit Heights City Water System Population: 6,075 Score: 25.9Mountain Regional Water Ssd Population: 8,245 Score: 25.3Orem City Water System Population: 98,129 Score: 25.1Highland City Population: 22,000 Score: 25.0Roy City Water System Population: 38,800 Score: 24.4Clinton City Water System Population: 23,000 Score: 24.0Ogden City Water System Population: 87,267 Score: 24.0Heber City Water System Population: 19,000 Score: 23.9Richfield City Population: 8,360 Score: 23.8Cedar Hills Town Water System Population: 10,015 Score: 23.7Tremonton City Population: 13,000 Score: 23.3Ivins Population: 10,465 Score: 23.1Pleasant View Culinary Water Population: 9,250 Score: 22.9Hooper Water Improvement District Population: 20,820 Score: 22.4Summit Water Distribution Population: 6,000 Score: 22.1Perry City Population: 6,570 Score: 21.7Midway City Water System Population: 7,055 Score: 21.5West Bountiful City Water System Population: 5,600 Score: 21.3Layton City Water System Population: 82,000 Score: 21.3West Point City Water System Population: 10,040 Score: 21.3Hyrum City Population: 10,891 Score: 21.1North Ogden City Population: 22,000 Score: 20.9South Ogden City Water System Population: 17,500 Score: 20.3Pleasant Grove City Population: 40,000 Score: 20.1Salem City Population: 9,298 Score: 20.0Mapleton City Population: 14,000 Score: 20.0Payson City Water System Population: 19,000 Score: 20.0Lindon City Population: 11,900 Score: 19.1Logan City Water System Population: 55,540 Score: 18.6Stansbury Park Improvement District Population: 9,839 Score: 17.4Riverdale City Water System Population: 8,945 Score: 16.4Taylor-West Weber Wid Population: 9,900 Score: 16.4Alpine City Population: 10,200 Score: 16.2Kanab City Population: 4,985 Score: 15.9Ashley Valley Water and Sewer Id Population: 13,835 Score: 12.9Providence City Water System Population: 9,690 Score: 10.6Utah State University Population: 9,000 Score: 10.6Moab City Population: 9,000 Score: 7.9Grand Water and Sewer Agency Population: 4,099 Score: 7.9Nephi City Population: 7,122 Score: 7.9Ephraim City Population: 7,000 Score: 7.9Vernal City Water System Population: 10,000 Score: 7.9Jordanelle Ssd Population: 2,345 Score: 7.9Bona Vista Water District Population: 29,000 Score: 5.9MISI score (0-100)Population served (log scale)

106 markets plotted.

Population View

People served by community water systems in Utah, colored by stress band.

~3.4M people served by 106 systems in Utah

Stable
Watch
Fragile
High Stress
Critical

106 scored systems · colored by stress band

Peer Constellation

Select a market to see its nearest peers by score similarity.

24 nearest peers by score distance.

Score Trend

Latest

26.6

Trend

+20.1

Observations

94

Mar 18, 2026 · 6.5Mar 20, 2026 · 6.5Mar 21, 2026 · 6.5Mar 22, 2026 · 6.5Mar 24, 2026 · 7.6Mar 25, 2026 · 7.9Mar 29, 2026 · 7.9Apr 2, 2026 · 12.2Apr 3, 2026 · 12.1Apr 4, 2026 · 8.4Apr 5, 2026 · 8.4Apr 6, 2026 · 26.6Apr 7, 2026 · 26.6Apr 8, 2026 · 27.2Apr 9, 2026 · 27.2Apr 10, 2026 · 27.2Apr 13, 2026 · 27.2Apr 14, 2026 · 27.2Apr 18, 2026 · 27.2Apr 19, 2026 · 27.2Apr 21, 2026 · 27.2Apr 22, 2026 · 27.2Apr 23, 2026 · 27.2Apr 24, 2026 · 27.2Apr 25, 2026 · 27.6Apr 26, 2026 · 26.7Apr 27, 2026 · 26.7Apr 28, 2026 · 26.7Apr 29, 2026 · 26.7Apr 30, 2026 · 26.7May 1, 2026 · 26.7May 2, 2026 · 26.7May 3, 2026 · 26.7May 4, 2026 · 26.7May 5, 2026 · 26.7May 6, 2026 · 26.7May 7, 2026 · 26.7May 8, 2026 · 26.7May 9, 2026 · 26.7May 10, 2026 · 26.7May 17, 2026 · 26.7May 19, 2026 · 26.7May 21, 2026 · 26.7May 22, 2026 · 26.7May 24, 2026 · 26.7May 26, 2026 · 26.7May 28, 2026 · 26.7May 31, 2026 · 26.6Jun 1, 2026 · 26.6Jun 2, 2026 · 26.6Jun 8, 2026 · 26.6Jun 11, 2026 · 26.6Jun 12, 2026 · 26.6Jun 14, 2026 · 26.6Jun 15, 2026 · 26.6Jun 16, 2026 · 26.6Jun 22, 2026 · 26.6Jun 23, 2026 · 26.6Jun 28, 2026 · 26.6Jun 29, 2026 · 26.6Jun 30, 2026 · 26.6Jul 1, 2026 · 26.6Jul 2, 2026 · 26.6Jul 3, 2026 · 26.6Jul 4, 2026 · 26.6Jul 5, 2026 · 26.6Jul 6, 2026 · 26.6Jul 7, 2026 · 26.6Jul 8, 2026 · 26.6Jul 9, 2026 · 26.6Jul 10, 2026 · 26.6Jul 11, 2026 · 26.6Jul 12, 2026 · 26.6Jul 13, 2026 · 26.6Jul 14, 2026 · 26.6Jul 16, 2026 · 26.6Jul 17, 2026 · 26.6Jul 18, 2026 · 26.6Jul 19, 2026 · 26.6Jul 20, 2026 · 26.6Jul 21, 2026 · 26.6Jul 22, 2026 · 26.6Jul 23, 2026 · 26.6Jul 29, 2026 · 26.6Jul 30, 2026 · 26.6Jul 31, 2026 · 26.6Aug 1, 2026 · 26.7Aug 2, 2026 · 26.7Aug 3, 2026 · 26.7Aug 8, 2026 · 26.6Aug 9, 2026 · 26.6Aug 10, 2026 · 26.6Aug 15, 2026 · 26.6Aug 16, 2026 · 26.6Mar 18, 2026Aug 16, 2026

Extended layers

Advanced State Context

Priority views, detailed registers, and methodology supporting the analytical core above.

Markets & signals

Priority Views

#MarketScoreBandPopulationSignals
1Murray City Water System44.2Fragile39K8
2Midvale City Water System43.5Fragile33K7
3West Jordan City Water System41.3Fragile117K8
4Holliday Water Company40.5Fragile15K7
5South Salt Lake City Water System40.5Fragile24K8
6Cedar City Waterworks39.1Watch40K6
7North Salt Lake City Water System38.9Watch19K7
8South Davis Water District37.9Watch11K7
9Herriman City Municipal Water Department37.6Watch60K7
10Salt Lake City Water System37.2Watch384K8
11North Logan City37.0Watch9K7
12Clearfield City Water System36.9Watch34K7
13Wellsville City Water System36.4Watch4K6
14Sandy City Water System36.3Watch100K7
15Bountiful City Water System35.9Watch38K7
16Kearns Improvement District35.6Watch57K7
17Bluffdale Water System35.5Watch20K6
18Waterpro Inc35.5Watch33K6
19Taylorsville-Bennion Id35.5Watch67K6
20Draper City Water System34.7Watch23K6

Detailed records

Registers

#MarketScoreBandPopulationSignals
1Murray City Water System44.2Fragile39K8
2Midvale City Water System43.5Fragile33K7
3West Jordan City Water System41.3Fragile117K8
4Holliday Water Company40.5Fragile15K7
5South Salt Lake City Water System40.5Fragile24K8
6Cedar City Waterworks39.1Watch40K6
7North Salt Lake City Water System38.9Watch19K7
8South Davis Water District37.9Watch11K7
9Herriman City Municipal Water Department37.6Watch60K7
10Salt Lake City Water System37.2Watch384K8
11North Logan City37.0Watch9K7
12Clearfield City Water System36.9Watch34K7
13Wellsville City Water System36.4Watch4K6
14Sandy City Water System36.3Watch100K7
15Bountiful City Water System35.9Watch38K7
16Kearns Improvement District35.6Watch57K7
17Bluffdale Water System35.5Watch20K6
18Waterpro Inc35.5Watch33K6
19Taylorsville-Bennion Id35.5Watch67K6
20Draper City Water System34.7Watch23K6

Keep monitoring this state

Research access covers saved monitoring, alerts, recurring briefs, and team review.

Get the Water Stress BriefRequest research access

Water Infrastructure in Utah

Munimetric tracks infrastructure stress across 106 community drinking-water systems in Utah. Each system receives a Munimetric Infrastructure Stress Index (MISI) score from 0 to 100, calculated across five risk families: Operational Stress, Capex Pressure, Revenue Fragility, Rate Constraint, and Governance Risk. Higher scores indicate more structural stress. Scores are source-backed and deterministic, drawing from EPA SDWA compliance records, American Community Survey demographic and economic data, FEMA National Risk Index hazard profiles, and state financial disclosures.

State-level monitoring shows which systems face the highest structural stress, how Utah compares against other states nationally, and which monitoring signals are most active across the state. Each individual system profile includes compliance history, score family drivers, peer rankings within population-based cohorts where safeguards pass, and public source context. Full provenance cards and source workbench views remain workflow-gated. Munimetric covers community water systems across all 50 states and territories. This is structural risk research—not a water quality rating, advisory feed, or credit rating. Updated May 2026.

The statewide public-record layer adds drinking-water violation categories, PFAS monitoring summaries where stored, lead and copper context, source-water mix, and official record links across covered systems. These records help explain water-system context alongside infrastructure stress without turning Munimetric into a tap-water safety determination.

What is the Munimetric score for Utah?
Munimetric assigns a state-level average MISI score based on the individual scores of all covered community water systems in Utah. The state average, band distribution, and market-level rankings are shown on this page. Higher MISI values indicate greater structural stress.
Which water systems in Utah face the most infrastructure stress?
The state page ranks the highest-stress systems in Utah by MISI score. Stress reflects operational burden, capital gaps, revenue fragility, rate affordability constraints, and governance risk, not a single compliance event. The headline remains a blended structural stress composite rather than a pure physical-condition index. Workflow actions remain reserved for account access.
How does Utah compare to other states for drinking water infrastructure risk?
Utah is compared against all 50 states and territories using average MISI score, market count, and band distribution. Munimetric tracks nationwide coverage across 9,000+ scored service markets.
Are there lead pipe or corrosion-related concerns in Utah water systems?
Where lead and copper rule compliance data is available from EPA SDWA records, Munimetric factors it into the Operational Stress family score. Specific lead service line inventories vary by system. Individual system profiles contain the most detailed compliance context available.
Does Munimetric include PFAS monitoring context for Utah water systems?
Munimetric summarizes stored PFAS monitoring context where public contaminant-monitoring records are available. Missing PFAS summaries remain missing records, not non-detections, and this public-record layer does not change the MISI score by itself.
What compliance signals are active in Utah?
Munimetric tracks signals such as compliance escalation, monitoring and reporting failures, population decline, income erosion, data staleness, and parent-government fiscal stress across Utah water systems.
Does Munimetric track boil water advisories in Utah?
Munimetric does not track real-time boil water advisories. For current advisories, contact your local water utility or state drinking water program. Munimetric monitors structural conditions that provide context around system reliability over time.