Munimetric Water System Profile

Xenia City PWS, OH

Drinking Water Infrastructure Profile

Munimetric analysis of drinking water infrastructure in Xenia City PWS, OH, Ohio, including MISI stress score, active signals, and peer-relative monitoring context. This profile highlights what is happening and why it matters using water-system, fiscal, capital, and signal context.

Xenia City PWS, OH has a MISI infrastructure stress score of 42.1/100 in the Fragile band as of 2026-05-28. Public records show groundwater sourcing, PFAS monitoring context, lead and copper compliance context and approximately 29,000 residents served. Updated May 2026.

FragileScore date May 28, 2026Methodology v0.1.2

State context

Current market shown in covered state context. Tile size reflects population served; color reflects stress band.

42.1Headline composite
FragileBand
97%Confidence
~29KPop. served
P95Peer percentile
10Active signals

Current headline composite

Component of current headline composite

Infrastructure Stress29.0 / 100

Physical, compliance, and capital-execution pressure reflected in the blended headline composite.

Socioeconomic Stress7.7 / 100

Affordability, demand-base, and parent-government fiscal pressure reflected in the blended headline composite.

Observability Stress5.5 / 100

Staleness, disclosure freshness, and reporting-visibility effects reflected in the blended headline composite.

42.1/100 headline compositeFragile97% confidencedrinking_water::community_water_system::25k_to_100k::ground_water~29K people served

Monitoring context stored

Water Quality & Supply Context

Public-record context for this system. Stored monitoring and compliance records only. Does not change MISI.

Public records
Records presentOHPWSID OH2902812.
Recent violations
29 records24 MRLead and Copper Rule Revisions, Revised Total Coliform Rule +3
Enforcement records
48 recordsStored public enforcement rows.
PFAS monitoring records
No listed detectionsUCMRStored PFAS monitoring records list 60 samples and 0 detections.
Lead/copper monitoring records
Records stored24 samplesStored lead/copper records list 0 open LCR violations and 0 action-level records.
Source / supply context
GroundwaterIdentity29,000 served; Dec 31, 2025.

Executive context

What the Data Suggests

As a community water provider for roughly 29,000 residents, Xenia City PWS, OH falls into the smaller tier of scored systems. The current reading places the system in a zone of moderate-to-elevated stress that goes beyond normal operating variation.

The score is being driven mainly by Operational Stress, which is running high in the model, with Capex Pressure adding further pressure. In other words, Operational Stress is doing most of the heavy lifting in the headline score.

7 active stress signals are attached to this system, including 4 at high severity. That signal mix points to a system where several warning indicators are firing at once, not just one extreme outlier.

Within Community · 25k–100k · Ground, this system ranks around the 95th percentile on measured stress, placing it among the more stressed systems in its peer group.

Recent observations suggest the system has been relatively steady rather than sharply improving or deteriorating — the current picture looks more like persistent underlying pressure than a sudden shift.

This summary is based on structured, source-backed public data and is intended for research and monitoring only. It is not investment advice, a credit opinion, or municipal advisory guidance.

Analytical posture

Market Stress Analytics

Family Contribution

MISI family contributions for this market.

Operational StressOperational Stress: 17.3 / 20.017.3Capex PressureCapex Pressure: 11.7 / 20.011.7Governance RiskGovernance Risk: 9.1 / 20.09.1Revenue FragilityRevenue Fragility: 4.0 / 20.04.0Rate ConstraintRate Constraint: 0.0 / 20.00.0

Peer Position

Where Xenia City PWS sits within its peer cohort.

0%25%50%75%100%42.1drinking_water::community_water_system::25k_to_100k::ground_water · 543 systems · 95th percentileLess stressMore stress
Income ErosionIncome Erosion: 15.2% weight — Available 15.2%Compliance EscalationCompliance Escalation: 9.1% weight — Available 9.1%Infrastructure Capit…Infrastructure Capital Gap: 9.1% weight — Available 9.1%Population Served De…Population Served Decline: 7.6% weight — Available 7.6%Housing Market Weakn…Housing Market Weakness: 7.6% weight — Available 7.6%Parent-Government Fi…Parent-Government Fiscal Stress: 7.6% weight — Available 7.6%Monitoring / Reporti…Monitoring / Reporting Failures: 6.1% weight — Available 6.1%Climate Hazard Expos…Climate Hazard Exposure: 6.1% weight — Available 6.1%Lead & Copper Rule R…Lead & Copper Rule Risk: 6.1% weight — Available 6.1%PFAS Contamination R…PFAS Contamination Risk: 6.1% weight — Available 6.1%SRF Dependence SpikeSRF Dependence Spike: 6.1% weight — Available 6.1%Utility Data StalenessUtility Data Staleness: 4.5% weight — Available 4.5%High-AGI Out-MigrationHigh-AGI Out-Migration: 3.0% weight — Available 3.0%Formal Enforcement O…Formal Enforcement Obligations: 3.0% weight — Available 3.0%Rapid Score Deterior…Rapid Score Deterioration: 3.0% weight — Available 3.0%
AvailableMissing

Score History

Latest

42.1

Trend

+42.1

Observations

46

Mar 24, 2026 · 0.0Mar 25, 2026 · 4.0Mar 29, 2026 · 4.0Apr 2, 2026 · 14.0Apr 3, 2026 · 14.0Apr 3, 2026 · 14.0Apr 4, 2026 · 14.0Apr 5, 2026 · 14.0Apr 5, 2026 · 14.0Apr 6, 2026 · 32.0Apr 7, 2026 · 32.0Apr 8, 2026 · 44.0Apr 9, 2026 · 44.0Apr 10, 2026 · 44.0Apr 13, 2026 · 44.0Apr 14, 2026 · 44.0Apr 18, 2026 · 44.0Apr 19, 2026 · 44.0Apr 21, 2026 · 44.0Apr 22, 2026 · 44.0Apr 23, 2026 · 44.0Apr 24, 2026 · 44.0Apr 25, 2026 · 44.0Apr 26, 2026 · 42.1Apr 26, 2026 · 44.0Apr 27, 2026 · 42.1Apr 28, 2026 · 42.1Apr 29, 2026 · 42.1Apr 30, 2026 · 42.1May 1, 2026 · 42.1May 2, 2026 · 42.1May 3, 2026 · 42.1May 4, 2026 · 42.1May 5, 2026 · 42.1May 6, 2026 · 42.1May 7, 2026 · 42.1May 8, 2026 · 42.1May 9, 2026 · 42.1May 10, 2026 · 42.1May 17, 2026 · 42.1May 19, 2026 · 42.1May 21, 2026 · 42.1May 22, 2026 · 42.1May 24, 2026 · 42.1May 26, 2026 · 42.1May 28, 2026 · 42.1Mar 24, 2026May 28, 2026

Structural Indicators

Operational Stress17.3 / 20.0

Operational Stress totals 17.256 points, led by compliance escalation.

Capex Pressure11.7 / 20.0

Capex Pressure totals 11.740 points, led by lead & copper rule risk.

Revenue Fragility4.0 / 20.0

Revenue Fragility totals 3.994 points, led by high-agi out-migration.

Rate Constraint0.0 / 20.0

Rate Constraint totals 0.000 points with no triggered factors.

Governance Risk9.1 / 20.0

Governance Risk totals 9.136 points, led by utility data staleness.

Stress movement

Diagnostics

Diagnostics & Movement

Compact status for confidence, data coverage, disclosure freshness, and stored score movement. Detailed diagnostic history remains available below.

Confidence

97%

Confidence is mainly capped by document freshness.

Factor coverage

Complete

All tracked confidence factors are currently available.

Disclosure freshness

Not available

No attached disclosure document has a usable reference date.

Latest movement

flat 0.0

Compared with May 26, 2026.

Last material movement

-1.9

Recorded Apr 26, 2026.

History

46 observations stored

Latest stored observation May 28, 2026.

Show detailed diagnostic history

Expanded stress diagnostics

Open detailed contribution diagnostics

No detailed factor diagnostics are stored for this profile snapshot.

Confidence summary

Confidence is mainly capped by document freshness.

Missing factor coverage

No factor gaps are recorded on the latest stored score.

Disclosure freshness diagnostics

0 attached local documents · 0 structured facts

No attached disclosure document has a usable reference date.

Latest reference Not available · stale after Not available

Score movement

flat 0.0

Previous run May 26, 2026

May 28, 2026

Score 42.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 26, 2026

Score 42.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 24, 2026

Score 42.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 22, 2026

Score 42.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 21, 2026

Score 42.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 19, 2026

Score 42.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 17, 2026

Score 42.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 10, 2026

Score 42.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 9, 2026

Score 42.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 8, 2026

Score 42.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 7, 2026

Score 42.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 6, 2026

Score 42.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 5, 2026

Score 42.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 4, 2026

Score 42.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 3, 2026

Score 42.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 2, 2026

Score 42.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 1, 2026

Score 42.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 30, 2026

Score 42.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 29, 2026

Score 42.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 28, 2026

Score 42.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 27, 2026

Score 42.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 26, 2026

Score 42.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run -1.9

Apr 26, 2026

Score 44.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 25, 2026

Score 44.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 24, 2026

Score 44.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 23, 2026

Score 44.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 22, 2026

Score 44.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 21, 2026

Score 44.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 19, 2026

Score 44.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 18, 2026

Score 44.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 14, 2026

Score 44.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 13, 2026

Score 44.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 10, 2026

Score 44.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 9, 2026

Score 44.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 8, 2026

Score 44.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 12.0

Apr 7, 2026

Score 32.0 in band watch. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 6, 2026

Score 32.0 in band watch. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 18.0

Apr 5, 2026

Score 14.0 in band stable. Confidence 84%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 5, 2026

Score 14.0 in band stable. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 4, 2026

Score 14.0 in band stable. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 3, 2026

Score 14.0 in band stable. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 3, 2026

Score 14.0 in band stable. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 2, 2026

Score 14.0 in band stable. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 10.0

Mar 29, 2026

Score 4.0 in band stable. Confidence 86%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Mar 25, 2026

Score 4.0 in band stable. Confidence 86%.

Delta vs prior run 4.0

Mar 24, 2026

Score 0.0 in band stable. Confidence 72%.

Signals

Signal Timeline

SignificantactiveNot availableRank #1

Signal
Compliance Escalation
Score impact
Not available
Resolved
Active
SignificantactiveNot availableRank #2

Signal
high agi outmigration
Score impact
Not available
Resolved
Active
SignificantactiveNot availableRank #3

Signal
lead copper rule risk
Score impact
Not available
Resolved
Active
MaterialactiveNot availableRank #4

Signal
climate hazard exposure
Score impact
Not available
Resolved
Active
SignificantresolvedNot availableRank #5

Signal
high agi outmigration
Score impact
Not available
Resolved
Apr 7, 2026
SignificantresolvedNot availableRank #6

Signal
lead copper rule risk
Score impact
Not available
Resolved
Apr 7, 2026
MaterialresolvedNot availableRank #7

Signal
climate hazard exposure
Score impact
Not available
Resolved
Apr 7, 2026
SignificantactiveNot availableRank #8

Signal
Utility Data Staleness
Score impact
Not available
Resolved
Active
MaterialactiveNot availableRank #9

Signal
Parent-Government Fiscal Stress
Score impact
Not available
Resolved
Active
EmergingactiveNot availableRank #10

Signal
Infrastructure Capital Gap
Score impact
Not available
Resolved
Active

Keep monitoring this market

Briefs and research access cover repeat monitoring, saved work, alerts, and team review.

About Xenia City PWS, OH

Xenia City PWS, OH is a community drinking-water system in Ohio that Munimetric monitors for infrastructure stress. The current MISI score of 42.1 out of 100 places this system in the fragile stress band as of 2026-05-28. The MISI composite reflects five structural risk families: Operational Stress, Capex Pressure, Revenue Fragility, Rate Constraint, and Governance Risk. Higher scores indicate more structural stress.

Data is assembled from EPA SDWA compliance records, American Community Survey demographic and economic indicators, FEMA National Risk Index hazard exposure data, state-reported financial disclosures, and stored public-record water quality context where available. This system serves approximately 29,000 people. The system has 29 recorded compliance violations in the SDWA record. Munimetric does not fabricate data where public records are unavailable. This profile is for structural monitoring and research—not a current-condition determination or credit rating. Updated May 2026.

What is the Munimetric score for Xenia City PWS, OH?
The current Munimetric Infrastructure Stress Index (MISI) score for Xenia City PWS, OH is 42.1 out of 100, placing this system in the fragile stress band. MISI is a composite of five structural risk families. Higher values indicate more stress. The score is deterministic, source-backed, and updated as new data becomes available.
Does Xenia City PWS, OH show signs of drinking-water infrastructure stress?
Munimetric monitors structural stress indicators for Xenia City PWS, OH across operational conditions, capital needs, revenue stability, rate affordability, and governance quality. The current MISI score and active signals shown in this profile reflect the latest available evidence from EPA, ACS, FEMA NRI, and state financial disclosures.
Does Munimetric rate current tap-water conditions for Xenia City PWS, OH?
No. Munimetric is not a water testing service and does not make current-condition determinations. This profile tracks structural conditions: compliance posture, financial pressure, infrastructure stress, and governance quality. For current water quality testing results, consult the system's Consumer Confidence Report or contact the local water utility.
Has Xenia City PWS, OH had a boil water advisory?
Munimetric does not track real-time boil water advisories. For current advisory status, contact your local water utility or state drinking water program. This profile tracks structural risk indicators and compliance history that provide long-term context around system reliability.
Are lead pipes or corrosion risk a concern in Xenia City PWS, OH?
Where EPA SDWA compliance data includes lead and copper rule monitoring, violations, or enforcement actions, that information feeds into the Operational Stress component of the MISI score. Munimetric does not fabricate lead pipe data where public records are silent.
Does Munimetric include PFAS monitoring context for Xenia City PWS, OH?
Where stored public records include UCMR or contaminant-monitoring summaries, Munimetric displays PFAS monitoring context as public-record evidence. Missing PFAS summaries are treated as missing records, not as non-detections. This context does not change MISI by itself.
What source-water context is available for Xenia City PWS, OH?
Munimetric displays stored source-water and supply context where public drinking-water identity records are available. Source-water context helps explain treatment and supply exposure, but missing source records remain explicit rather than inferred.
Why might water rates be increasing in Xenia City PWS, OH?
Rate pressure can reflect capital investment needs, a declining customer base, revenue fragility, affordability constraints, or parent-government fiscal stress. The Rate Constraint and Revenue Fragility score families specifically measure these pressures where data is available from public financial disclosures.
What does the MISI score mean for Xenia City PWS, OH?
The MISI score (42.1/100) is a composite measure of structural risk across five families: Operational Stress, Capex Pressure, Revenue Fragility, Rate Constraint, and Governance Risk. The headline remains a blended structural stress composite rather than a pure physical-condition index. The current methodology also downweights factors that are nearly universal or very rare in the frozen national reference population, so one common contextual factor does not dominate the headline by itself. Higher scores indicate more structural stress. It is deterministic and source-backed, not a credit rating.