Munimetric Water System Profile

Tacoma Water Division, City of, WA

Drinking Water Infrastructure Profile

Munimetric analysis of drinking water infrastructure in Tacoma Water Division, City of, WA, Washington, including MISI stress score, active signals, and peer-relative monitoring context. This profile highlights what is happening and why it matters using water-system, fiscal, capital, and signal context.

Tacoma Water Division, City of, WA has a MISI infrastructure stress score of 46.7/100 in the Fragile band as of 2026-05-22. Public records show surface-water sourcing, PFAS monitoring context, lead and copper compliance context and approximately 448,771 residents served. Updated May 2026.

FragileScore date May 22, 2026Methodology v0.1.2

State context

Current market shown in covered state context. Tile size reflects population served; color reflects stress band.

46.7Headline composite
FragileBand
96%Confidence
~449KPop. served
P92Peer percentile
10Active signals

Current headline composite

Component of current headline composite

Infrastructure Stress35.1 / 100

Physical, compliance, and capital-execution pressure reflected in the blended headline composite.

Socioeconomic Stress6.2 / 100

Affordability, demand-base, and parent-government fiscal pressure reflected in the blended headline composite.

Observability Stress5.5 / 100

Staleness, disclosure freshness, and reporting-visibility effects reflected in the blended headline composite.

46.7/100 headline compositeFragile96% confidencedrinking_water::community_water_system::250k_plus::surface_water~449K people served

Monitoring context stored

Water Quality & Supply Context

Public-record context for this system. Stored monitoring and compliance records only. Does not change MISI.

Public records
Records presentWAPWSID WA5386800.
Recent violations
34 records16 MRConsumer Confidence Rule, Surface Water Treatment Rule +2
Enforcement records
34 recordsStored public enforcement rows.
PFAS monitoring records
5 detections0.01Stored PFAS monitoring records list 240 samples and 5 detections.
Lead/copper monitoring records
Records stored19 samplesStored lead/copper records list 0 open LCR violations and 0 action-level records.
Source / supply context
Surface waterIdentity448,771 served; Dec 31, 2025.

Executive context

What the Data Suggests

Tacoma Water Division, City of, WA's public water system serves roughly 448,771 residents, placing it among the larger community systems in this coverage set. The current reading places the system in a zone of moderate-to-elevated stress that goes beyond normal operating variation.

The score is being driven mainly by Capex Pressure, which is at the top of its range in the model, with Operational Stress adding another heavy layer of pressure. That combination suggests strain is showing up across core system functions, not just one isolated dimension.

7 active stress signals are attached to this system, including 3 at high severity. That signal mix points to a system where several warning indicators are firing at once, not just one extreme outlier.

Within Community · 250k+ · Surface, this system ranks around the 92nd percentile on measured stress, placing it among the more stressed systems in its peer group.

Recent observations suggest the system has been relatively steady rather than sharply improving or deteriorating — the current picture looks more like persistent underlying pressure than a sudden shift.

This summary is based on structured, source-backed public data and is intended for research and monitoring only. It is not investment advice, a credit opinion, or municipal advisory guidance.

Analytical posture

Market Stress Analytics

Family Contribution

MISI family contributions for this market.

Capex PressureCapex Pressure: 20.0 / 20.020.0Operational StressOperational Stress: 15.1 / 20.015.1Revenue FragilityRevenue Fragility: 6.2 / 20.06.2Governance RiskGovernance Risk: 5.5 / 20.05.5Rate ConstraintRate Constraint: 0.0 / 20.00.0

Peer Position

Where Tacoma Water Division, City of sits within its peer cohort.

0%25%50%75%100%46.7drinking_water::community_water_system::250k_plus::surface_water · 157 systems · 92th percentileLess stressMore stress
Income ErosionIncome Erosion: 15.2% weight — Available 15.2%Compliance EscalationCompliance Escalation: 9.1% weight — Available 9.1%Infrastructure Capit…Infrastructure Capital Gap: 9.1% weight — Available 9.1%Population Served De…Population Served Decline: 7.6% weight — Available 7.6%Housing Market Weakn…Housing Market Weakness: 7.6% weight — Available 7.6%Parent-Government Fi…Parent-Government Fiscal Stress: 7.6% weight — Available 7.6%Monitoring / Reporti…Monitoring / Reporting Failures: 6.1% weight — Available 6.1%Climate Hazard Expos…Climate Hazard Exposure: 6.1% weight — Available 6.1%Lead & Copper Rule R…Lead & Copper Rule Risk: 6.1% weight — Available 6.1%PFAS Contamination R…PFAS Contamination Risk: 6.1% weight — Available 6.1%SRF Dependence SpikeSRF Dependence Spike: 6.1% weight — Available 6.1%Utility Data StalenessUtility Data Staleness: 4.5% weight — Available 4.5%High-AGI Out-MigrationHigh-AGI Out-Migration: 3.0% weight — Available 3.0%Formal Enforcement O…Formal Enforcement Obligations: 3.0% weight — Available 3.0%Rapid Score Deterior…Rapid Score Deterioration: 3.0% weight — Available 3.0%
AvailableMissing

Score History

Latest

46.7

Trend

+39.7

Observations

47

Mar 18, 2026 · 7.0Mar 20, 2026 · 7.0Mar 21, 2026 · 7.0Mar 22, 2026 · 7.0Mar 24, 2026 · 15.0Mar 25, 2026 · 23.0Mar 29, 2026 · 23.0Apr 2, 2026 · 29.0Apr 3, 2026 · 29.0Apr 3, 2026 · 29.0Apr 4, 2026 · 29.0Apr 5, 2026 · 29.0Apr 5, 2026 · 29.0Apr 6, 2026 · 49.0Apr 7, 2026 · 49.0Apr 8, 2026 · 49.0Apr 9, 2026 · 49.0Apr 10, 2026 · 49.0Apr 13, 2026 · 49.0Apr 14, 2026 · 49.0Apr 18, 2026 · 49.0Apr 19, 2026 · 49.0Apr 21, 2026 · 49.0Apr 22, 2026 · 49.0Apr 23, 2026 · 49.0Apr 24, 2026 · 49.0Apr 25, 2026 · 49.0Apr 26, 2026 · 46.7Apr 26, 2026 · 49.0Apr 27, 2026 · 46.7Apr 28, 2026 · 46.7Apr 29, 2026 · 46.7Apr 30, 2026 · 46.7May 1, 2026 · 46.7May 2, 2026 · 46.7May 3, 2026 · 46.7May 4, 2026 · 46.7May 5, 2026 · 46.7May 6, 2026 · 46.7May 7, 2026 · 46.7May 8, 2026 · 46.7May 9, 2026 · 46.7May 10, 2026 · 46.7May 17, 2026 · 46.7May 19, 2026 · 46.7May 21, 2026 · 46.7May 22, 2026 · 46.7Mar 18, 2026May 22, 2026

Structural Indicators

Operational Stress15.1 / 20.0

Operational Stress totals 15.104 points, led by compliance escalation.

Capex Pressure20.0 / 20.0

Capex Pressure totals 20.000 points, led by lead & copper rule risk.

Revenue Fragility6.2 / 20.0

Revenue Fragility totals 6.161 points, led by housing market weakness.

Rate Constraint0.0 / 20.0

Rate Constraint totals 0.000 points with no triggered factors.

Governance Risk5.5 / 20.0

Governance Risk totals 5.473 points, led by utility data staleness.

Stress movement

Diagnostics

Diagnostics & Movement

Compact status for confidence, data coverage, disclosure freshness, and stored score movement. Detailed diagnostic history remains available below.

Confidence

96%

Confidence is mainly capped by document freshness.

Factor coverage

Complete

All tracked confidence factors are currently available.

Disclosure freshness

Not available

No attached disclosure document has a usable reference date.

Latest movement

flat 0.0

Compared with May 21, 2026.

Last material movement

-2.3

Recorded Apr 26, 2026.

History

47 observations stored

Latest stored observation May 22, 2026.

Show detailed diagnostic history

Expanded stress diagnostics

Open detailed contribution diagnostics

No detailed factor diagnostics are stored for this profile snapshot.

Confidence summary

Confidence is mainly capped by document freshness.

Missing factor coverage

No factor gaps are recorded on the latest stored score.

Disclosure freshness diagnostics

0 attached local documents · 0 structured facts

No attached disclosure document has a usable reference date.

Latest reference Not available · stale after Not available

Score movement

flat 0.0

Previous run May 21, 2026

May 22, 2026

Score 46.7 in band fragile. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 21, 2026

Score 46.7 in band fragile. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 19, 2026

Score 46.7 in band fragile. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 17, 2026

Score 46.7 in band fragile. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 10, 2026

Score 46.7 in band fragile. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 9, 2026

Score 46.7 in band fragile. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 8, 2026

Score 46.7 in band fragile. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 7, 2026

Score 46.7 in band fragile. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 6, 2026

Score 46.7 in band fragile. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 5, 2026

Score 46.7 in band fragile. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 4, 2026

Score 46.7 in band fragile. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 3, 2026

Score 46.7 in band fragile. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 2, 2026

Score 46.7 in band fragile. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 1, 2026

Score 46.7 in band fragile. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 30, 2026

Score 46.7 in band fragile. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 29, 2026

Score 46.7 in band fragile. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 28, 2026

Score 46.7 in band fragile. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 27, 2026

Score 46.7 in band fragile. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 26, 2026

Score 46.7 in band fragile. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run -2.3

Apr 26, 2026

Score 49.0 in band fragile. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 25, 2026

Score 49.0 in band fragile. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 24, 2026

Score 49.0 in band fragile. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 23, 2026

Score 49.0 in band fragile. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 22, 2026

Score 49.0 in band fragile. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 21, 2026

Score 49.0 in band fragile. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 19, 2026

Score 49.0 in band fragile. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 18, 2026

Score 49.0 in band fragile. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 14, 2026

Score 49.0 in band fragile. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 13, 2026

Score 49.0 in band fragile. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 10, 2026

Score 49.0 in band fragile. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 9, 2026

Score 49.0 in band fragile. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 8, 2026

Score 49.0 in band fragile. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 7, 2026

Score 49.0 in band fragile. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 6, 2026

Score 49.0 in band fragile. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 20.0

Apr 5, 2026

Score 29.0 in band watch. Confidence 83%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 5, 2026

Score 29.0 in band watch. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 4, 2026

Score 29.0 in band watch. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 3, 2026

Score 29.0 in band watch. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 3, 2026

Score 29.0 in band watch. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 2, 2026

Score 29.0 in band watch. Confidence 96%.

Delta vs prior run 6.0

Mar 29, 2026

Score 23.0 in band watch. Confidence 85%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Mar 25, 2026

Score 23.0 in band watch. Confidence 85%.

Delta vs prior run 8.0

Mar 24, 2026

Score 15.0 in band stable. Confidence 77%.

Delta vs prior run 8.0

Mar 22, 2026

Score 7.0 in band stable. Confidence 77%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Mar 21, 2026

Score 7.0 in band stable. Confidence 77%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Mar 20, 2026

Score 7.0 in band stable. Confidence 77%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Mar 18, 2026

Score 7.0 in band stable. Confidence 77%.

Signals

Signal Timeline

MaterialactiveNot availableRank #1

Signal
pfas contamination risk
Score impact
Not available
Resolved
Active
SignificantactiveNot availableRank #2

Signal
lead copper rule risk
Score impact
Not available
Resolved
Active
SignificantactiveNot availableRank #3

Signal
climate hazard exposure
Score impact
Not available
Resolved
Active
MaterialresolvedNot availableRank #4

Signal
pfas contamination risk
Score impact
Not available
Resolved
Apr 7, 2026
SignificantresolvedNot availableRank #5

Signal
lead copper rule risk
Score impact
Not available
Resolved
Apr 7, 2026
SignificantresolvedNot availableRank #6

Signal
climate hazard exposure
Score impact
Not available
Resolved
Apr 7, 2026
SignificantactiveNot availableRank #7

Signal
Utility Data Staleness
Score impact
Not available
Resolved
Active
MaterialactiveNot availableRank #8

Signal
Infrastructure Capital Gap
Score impact
Not available
Resolved
Active
MaterialactiveNot availableRank #9

Signal
Compliance Escalation
Score impact
Not available
Resolved
Active
MaterialactiveNot availableRank #10

Signal
Housing Market Weakness
Score impact
Not available
Resolved
Active

Keep monitoring this market

Briefs and research access cover repeat monitoring, saved work, alerts, and team review.

About Tacoma Water Division, City of, WA

Tacoma Water Division, City of, WA is a community drinking-water system in Washington that Munimetric monitors for infrastructure stress. The current MISI score of 46.7 out of 100 places this system in the fragile stress band as of 2026-05-22. The MISI composite reflects five structural risk families: Operational Stress, Capex Pressure, Revenue Fragility, Rate Constraint, and Governance Risk. Higher scores indicate more structural stress.

Data is assembled from EPA SDWA compliance records, American Community Survey demographic and economic indicators, FEMA National Risk Index hazard exposure data, state-reported financial disclosures, and stored public-record water quality context where available. This system serves approximately 448,771 people. The system has 34 recorded compliance violations in the SDWA record. Munimetric does not fabricate data where public records are unavailable. This profile is for structural monitoring and research—not a current-condition determination or credit rating. Updated May 2026.

What is the Munimetric score for Tacoma Water Division, City of, WA?
The current Munimetric Infrastructure Stress Index (MISI) score for Tacoma Water Division, City of, WA is 46.7 out of 100, placing this system in the fragile stress band. MISI is a composite of five structural risk families. Higher values indicate more stress. The score is deterministic, source-backed, and updated as new data becomes available.
Does Tacoma Water Division, City of, WA show signs of drinking-water infrastructure stress?
Munimetric monitors structural stress indicators for Tacoma Water Division, City of, WA across operational conditions, capital needs, revenue stability, rate affordability, and governance quality. The current MISI score and active signals shown in this profile reflect the latest available evidence from EPA, ACS, FEMA NRI, and state financial disclosures.
Does Munimetric rate current tap-water conditions for Tacoma Water Division, City of, WA?
No. Munimetric is not a water testing service and does not make current-condition determinations. This profile tracks structural conditions: compliance posture, financial pressure, infrastructure stress, and governance quality. For current water quality testing results, consult the system's Consumer Confidence Report or contact the local water utility.
Has Tacoma Water Division, City of, WA had a boil water advisory?
Munimetric does not track real-time boil water advisories. For current advisory status, contact your local water utility or state drinking water program. This profile tracks structural risk indicators and compliance history that provide long-term context around system reliability.
Are lead pipes or corrosion risk a concern in Tacoma Water Division, City of, WA?
Where EPA SDWA compliance data includes lead and copper rule monitoring, violations, or enforcement actions, that information feeds into the Operational Stress component of the MISI score. Munimetric does not fabricate lead pipe data where public records are silent.
Does Munimetric include PFAS monitoring context for Tacoma Water Division, City of, WA?
Where stored public records include UCMR or contaminant-monitoring summaries, Munimetric displays PFAS monitoring context as public-record evidence. Missing PFAS summaries are treated as missing records, not as non-detections. This context does not change MISI by itself.
What source-water context is available for Tacoma Water Division, City of, WA?
Munimetric displays stored source-water and supply context where public drinking-water identity records are available. Source-water context helps explain treatment and supply exposure, but missing source records remain explicit rather than inferred.
Why might water rates be increasing in Tacoma Water Division, City of, WA?
Rate pressure can reflect capital investment needs, a declining customer base, revenue fragility, affordability constraints, or parent-government fiscal stress. The Rate Constraint and Revenue Fragility score families specifically measure these pressures where data is available from public financial disclosures.
What does the MISI score mean for Tacoma Water Division, City of, WA?
The MISI score (46.7/100) is a composite measure of structural risk across five families: Operational Stress, Capex Pressure, Revenue Fragility, Rate Constraint, and Governance Risk. The headline remains a blended structural stress composite rather than a pure physical-condition index. The current methodology also downweights factors that are nearly universal or very rare in the frozen national reference population, so one common contextual factor does not dominate the headline by itself. Higher scores indicate more structural stress. It is deterministic and source-backed, not a credit rating.