MISI Score
38.8
Watch
Project NC / Anson County
Anson County
BOTH · Anson CountyDistressedPWSID NC0304010
Score Confidence
1.0%
Peer Percentile
92.8th
As of
Sep 10, 2026
EXPLANATION
Score Drivers
- MISI score is 38.812 (Watch).
- Infrastructure Capital Gap adds 11.238 points. Capex pressure contributes +12: drinking-water capital need is 121883133.198285 with per-capita burden 8781.21. variance weighting adjusted headline contribution from 12 to 11.238.
- Population Served Decline adds 9.106 points. Population trend contributes +10: five-year population change is -10.493133%. variance weighting adjusted headline contribution from 10 to 9.106.
- Lead & Copper Rule Risk adds 7.994 points. Lead and copper risk contributes +8 because direct lead sample exceedances were recorded: lead sample exceedances=2, copper sample exceedances=0, legacy action-level exceedances=0, open LCR violations=3. variance weighting adjusted headline contribution from 8 to 7.994.
- PFAS Contamination Risk adds 5.998 points. PFAS contamination contributes +6: detections=5, max result=0.005500 ng/L. variance weighting adjusted headline contribution from 6 to 5.998.
- Missing or unresolved factors: Project Status Staleness.
MARKET INTERPRETATION
What the data suggests
As a community water provider for roughly 13,880 residents, Anson County falls into the smaller tier of scored systems. At the latest reading, Munimetric flags the system as showing early but meaningful signs of structural stress.
The score is being driven mainly by Capex Pressure, which is at the top of its range in the model, with Operational Stress adding further pressure. In other words, Capex Pressure is doing most of the heavy lifting in the headline score.
7 active stress signals are attached to this system, including 3 at high severity. That signal mix points to a system where several warning indicators are firing at once, not just one extreme outlier.
Within its peer cohort, this system ranks around the 93rd percentile on measured stress, placing it among the more stressed systems in its peer group.
Recent score history has been relatively steady, consistent with the system's overall profile.
This summary is based on structured, source-backed public data and is intended for research and monitoring only. It is not investment advice, a credit opinion, or municipal advisory guidance.
SCORE STACK
Family Contributions
Operational Stress9.7 / 20.0
Capex Pressure20.0 / 20.0
Revenue Fragility9.1 / 20.0
Rate Constraint0.0 / 20.0
Governance Risk0.0 / 20.0
SL 2020-79
SWIA Assessment History
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 8 |
ACTIVE SIGNALS
7 Signals
Compliance Escalation
Repeated or serious compliance failures often indicate rising operational and infrastructure stress.
Score impact: 5.9 · Family: Operational Stress
Climate Hazard Exposure
Elevated drought and flood exposure raises outage, source-water, and infrastructure reliability stress.
Score impact: 1.8 · Family: Operational Stress
Current Drought Severity
Active drought conditions stress source-water availability and treatment operations.
Score impact: 2.0 · Family: Operational Stress
Population Served Decline
A shrinking served population weakens the customer base and raises infrastructure cost per customer.
Score impact: 9.1 · Family: Revenue Fragility
Infrastructure Capital Gap
Large structural capital need relative to local support capacity often precedes major rate or funding pressure.
Score impact: 11.2 · Family: Capex Pressure
Lead & Copper Rule Risk
Lead and copper exceedances and replacement obligations can drive near-term treatment and capital pressure.
Score impact: 8.0 · Family: Capex Pressure
PFAS Contamination Risk
PFAS detections can force expensive treatment retrofits and accelerate capital plans.
Score impact: 6.0 · Family: Capex Pressure
HISTORY
Score Trend
Latest
38.8
Trend
+18.8
Observations
112
Population Served
13,880