Physical, compliance, and capital-execution pressure reflected in the blended headline composite.
Munimetric Water System Profile
Georgetown Water Dept., MA
Drinking Water Infrastructure Profile
Munimetric analysis of drinking water infrastructure in Georgetown Water Dept., MA, Massachusetts, including MISI stress score, active signals, and peer-relative monitoring context. This profile highlights what is happening and why it matters using water-system, fiscal, capital, and signal context.
Georgetown Water Dept., MA has a MISI infrastructure stress score of 46.5/100 in the Fragile band as of 2026-05-17. Public records show groundwater sourcing, PFAS monitoring context, lead and copper compliance context and approximately 8,766 residents served. Updated May 2026.
State context
Current market shown in covered state context. Tile size reflects population served; color reflects stress band.
Current headline composite
Component of current headline composite
Affordability, demand-base, and parent-government fiscal pressure reflected in the blended headline composite.
Staleness, disclosure freshness, and reporting-visibility effects reflected in the blended headline composite.
Monitoring context stored
Water Quality & Supply Context
Public-record context for this system. Stored monitoring and compliance records only. Does not change MISI.
Executive context
What the Data Suggests
Georgetown Water Dept., MA is a smaller community water system, serving approximately 8,766 residents. The current reading places the system in a zone of moderate-to-elevated stress that goes beyond normal operating variation.
The score is being driven mainly by Operational Stress, which is at the top of its range in the model, with Capex Pressure adding another heavy layer of pressure. That combination suggests strain is showing up across core system functions, not just one isolated dimension.
8 active stress signals are attached to this system, including 6 at high severity. That signal mix points to a system where several warning indicators are firing at once, not just one extreme outlier.
Within Community · < 25k · Ground, this system ranks around the 98th percentile on measured stress, placing it near the top of peer-group stress.
Recent observations suggest the system has been relatively steady rather than sharply improving or deteriorating — the current picture looks more like persistent underlying pressure than a sudden shift.
This summary is based on structured, source-backed public data and is intended for research and monitoring only. It is not investment advice, a credit opinion, or municipal advisory guidance.
Analytical posture
Market Stress Analytics
Family Contribution
MISI family contributions for this market.
Peer Position
Where Georgetown Water Dept. sits within its peer cohort.
Score History
Latest
46.5
Trend
+46.5
Observations
40
Structural Indicators
Operational Stress totals 20.000 points, led by compliance escalation.
Capex Pressure totals 19.232 points, led by infrastructure capital gap.
Revenue Fragility totals 3.994 points, led by high-agi out-migration.
Rate Constraint totals 0.000 points with no triggered factors.
Governance Risk totals 3.225 points, led by rapid score deterioration.
Stress movement
Diagnostics
Diagnostics & Movement
Compact status for confidence, data coverage, disclosure freshness, and stored score movement. Detailed diagnostic history remains available below.
Confidence
97%
Confidence is mainly capped by document freshness.
Factor coverage
Complete
All tracked confidence factors are currently available.
Disclosure freshness
Not available
No attached disclosure document has a usable reference date.
Latest movement
flat 0.0
Compared with May 10, 2026.
Last material movement
-1.5
Recorded Apr 26, 2026.
History
40 observations stored
Latest stored observation May 17, 2026.
Show detailed diagnostic history
Expanded stress diagnostics
Open detailed contribution diagnostics
No detailed factor diagnostics are stored for this profile snapshot.
Confidence summary
Confidence is mainly capped by document freshness.
Missing factor coverage
No factor gaps are recorded on the latest stored score.
Disclosure freshness diagnostics
0 attached local documents · 0 structured facts
No attached disclosure document has a usable reference date.
Latest reference Not available · stale after Not available
Score movement
flat 0.0
Previous run May 10, 2026
May 17, 2026
Score 46.5 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 10, 2026
Score 46.5 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 9, 2026
Score 46.5 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 8, 2026
Score 46.5 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 7, 2026
Score 46.5 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 6, 2026
Score 46.5 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 5, 2026
Score 46.5 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 4, 2026
Score 46.5 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 3, 2026
Score 46.5 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 2, 2026
Score 46.5 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 1, 2026
Score 46.5 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 30, 2026
Score 46.5 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 29, 2026
Score 46.5 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 28, 2026
Score 46.5 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 27, 2026
Score 46.5 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 26, 2026
Score 46.5 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run -1.5
Apr 26, 2026
Score 48.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 25, 2026
Score 48.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 24, 2026
Score 48.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 23, 2026
Score 48.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 22, 2026
Score 48.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 21, 2026
Score 48.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 19, 2026
Score 48.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 18, 2026
Score 48.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 14, 2026
Score 48.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 13, 2026
Score 48.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 10, 2026
Score 48.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 9, 2026
Score 48.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 8, 2026
Score 48.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 7, 2026
Score 48.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 6, 2026
Score 48.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 16.0
Apr 5, 2026
Score 32.0 in band watch. Confidence 84%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 5, 2026
Score 32.0 in band watch. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 4, 2026
Score 32.0 in band watch. Confidence 97%.
Delta vs prior run 4.0
Apr 3, 2026
Score 28.0 in band watch. Confidence 93%.
Delta vs prior run -4.0
Apr 3, 2026
Score 32.0 in band watch. Confidence 93%.
Delta vs prior run 20.0
Apr 2, 2026
Score 12.0 in band stable. Confidence 93%.
Delta vs prior run 12.0
Mar 29, 2026
Score 0.0 in band stable. Confidence 84%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Mar 25, 2026
Score 0.0 in band stable. Confidence 84%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Mar 24, 2026
Score 0.0 in band stable. Confidence 76%.
Signals
Signal Timeline
- Signal
- high agi outmigration
- Score impact
- Not available
- Resolved
- Active
- Signal
- lead copper rule risk
- Score impact
- Not available
- Resolved
- Active
- Signal
- current drought severity
- Score impact
- Not available
- Resolved
- Active
- Signal
- climate hazard exposure
- Score impact
- Not available
- Resolved
- Active
- Signal
- high agi outmigration
- Score impact
- Not available
- Resolved
- Apr 7, 2026
- Signal
- lead copper rule risk
- Score impact
- Not available
- Resolved
- Apr 7, 2026
- Signal
- current drought severity
- Score impact
- Not available
- Resolved
- Apr 7, 2026
- Signal
- climate hazard exposure
- Score impact
- Not available
- Resolved
- Apr 7, 2026
- Signal
- Rapid Score Deterioration
- Score impact
- Not available
- Resolved
- Active
- Signal
- Monitoring and Reporting Failures
- Score impact
- Not available
- Resolved
- Active
- Signal
- Compliance Escalation
- Score impact
- Not available
- Resolved
- Active
- Signal
- Infrastructure Capital Gap
- Score impact
- Not available
- Resolved
- Active
Keep monitoring this market
Briefs and workflow access cover repeat monitoring, saved work, exports, Track, and Munex workflows.
About Georgetown Water Dept., MA
Georgetown Water Dept., MA is a community drinking-water system in Massachusetts that Munimetric monitors for infrastructure stress. The current MISI score of 46.5 out of 100 places this system in the fragile stress band as of 2026-05-17. The MISI composite reflects five structural risk families: Operational Stress, Capex Pressure, Revenue Fragility, Rate Constraint, and Governance Risk. Higher scores indicate more structural stress.
Data is assembled from EPA SDWA compliance records, American Community Survey demographic and economic indicators, FEMA National Risk Index hazard exposure data, state-reported financial disclosures, and stored public-record water quality context where available. This system serves approximately 8,766 people. The system has 88 recorded compliance violations in the SDWA record. Munimetric does not fabricate data where public records are unavailable. This profile is for structural monitoring and research—not a current-condition determination or credit rating. Updated May 2026.
- What is the Munimetric score for Georgetown Water Dept., MA?
- The current Munimetric Infrastructure Stress Index (MISI) score for Georgetown Water Dept., MA is 46.5 out of 100, placing this system in the fragile stress band. MISI is a composite of five structural risk families. Higher values indicate more stress. The score is deterministic, source-backed, and updated as new data becomes available.
- Does Georgetown Water Dept., MA show signs of drinking-water infrastructure stress?
- Munimetric monitors structural stress indicators for Georgetown Water Dept., MA across operational conditions, capital needs, revenue stability, rate affordability, and governance quality. The current MISI score and active signals shown in this profile reflect the latest available evidence from EPA, ACS, FEMA NRI, and state financial disclosures.
- Does Munimetric rate current tap-water conditions for Georgetown Water Dept., MA?
- No. Munimetric is not a water testing service and does not make current-condition determinations. This profile tracks structural conditions: compliance posture, financial pressure, infrastructure stress, and governance quality. For current water quality testing results, consult the system's Consumer Confidence Report or contact the local water utility.
- Has Georgetown Water Dept., MA had a boil water advisory?
- Munimetric does not track real-time boil water advisories. For current advisory status, contact your local water utility or state drinking water program. This profile tracks structural risk indicators and compliance history that provide long-term context around system reliability.
- Are lead pipes or corrosion risk a concern in Georgetown Water Dept., MA?
- Where EPA SDWA compliance data includes lead and copper rule monitoring, violations, or enforcement actions, that information feeds into the Operational Stress component of the MISI score. Munimetric does not fabricate lead pipe data where public records are silent.
- Does Munimetric include PFAS monitoring context for Georgetown Water Dept., MA?
- Where stored public records include UCMR or contaminant-monitoring summaries, Munimetric displays PFAS monitoring context as public-record evidence. Missing PFAS summaries are treated as missing records, not as non-detections. This context does not change MISI by itself.
- What source-water context is available for Georgetown Water Dept., MA?
- Munimetric displays stored source-water and supply context where public drinking-water identity records are available. Source-water context helps explain treatment and supply exposure, but missing source records remain explicit rather than inferred.
- Why might water rates be increasing in Georgetown Water Dept., MA?
- Rate pressure can reflect capital investment needs, a declining customer base, revenue fragility, affordability constraints, or parent-government fiscal stress. The Rate Constraint and Revenue Fragility score families specifically measure these pressures where data is available from public financial disclosures.
- What does the MISI score mean for Georgetown Water Dept., MA?
- The MISI score (46.5/100) is a composite measure of structural risk across five families: Operational Stress, Capex Pressure, Revenue Fragility, Rate Constraint, and Governance Risk. The headline remains a blended structural stress composite rather than a pure physical-condition index. The current methodology also downweights factors that are nearly universal or very rare in the frozen national reference population, so one common contextual factor does not dominate the headline by itself. Higher scores indicate more structural stress. It is deterministic and source-backed, not a credit rating.
- U.S. water infrastructure stress monitoring homepage
- Water infrastructure risk in Massachusetts
- How Munimetric scores drinking water systems
- Compare water system profiles in the Screener
- Water infrastructure risk by state
- Water infrastructure research & guides
- Munimetric analytical rankings
- Fastest-Deteriorating Water Systems
- Largest Systems with Rapid Score Deterioration
- Systems with Monitoring/Reporting Failures
- Largest Water Systems with Monitoring/Reporting Failures
- Massachusetts MISI stress-band comparison hub
- Massachusetts water systems by population served
- Massachusetts water systems by source-water context