What is the Munimetric score for Springfield Water and Sewer Commission, MA?

The current Munimetric Infrastructure Stress Index (MISI) score for Springfield Water and Sewer Commission, MA is 40.1 out of 100, placing this system in the fragile stress band. MISI is a composite of five structural risk families. Higher values indicate more stress. The score is deterministic, source-backed, and updated as new data becomes available.

Does Springfield Water and Sewer Commission, MA show signs of drinking-water infrastructure stress?

Munimetric monitors structural stress indicators for Springfield Water and Sewer Commission, MA across operational conditions, capital needs, revenue stability, rate affordability, and governance quality. The current MISI score and active signals shown in this profile reflect the latest available evidence from EPA, ACS, FEMA NRI, and state financial disclosures.

Does Munimetric rate current tap-water conditions for Springfield Water and Sewer Commission, MA?

No. Munimetric is not a water testing service and does not make current-condition determinations. This profile tracks structural conditions: compliance posture, financial pressure, infrastructure stress, and governance quality. For current water quality testing results, consult the system's Consumer Confidence Report or contact the local water utility.

Has Springfield Water and Sewer Commission, MA had a boil water advisory?

Munimetric does not track real-time boil water advisories. For current advisory status, contact your local water utility or state drinking water program. This profile tracks structural risk indicators and compliance history that provide long-term context around system reliability.

Are lead pipes or corrosion risk a concern in Springfield Water and Sewer Commission, MA?

Where EPA SDWA compliance data includes lead and copper rule monitoring, violations, or enforcement actions, that information feeds into the Operational Stress component of the MISI score. Munimetric does not fabricate lead pipe data where public records are silent.

Does Munimetric include PFAS monitoring context for Springfield Water and Sewer Commission, MA?

Where stored public records include UCMR or contaminant-monitoring summaries, Munimetric displays PFAS monitoring context as public-record evidence. Missing PFAS summaries are treated as missing records, not as non-detections. This context does not change MISI by itself.

What source-water context is available for Springfield Water and Sewer Commission, MA?

Munimetric displays stored source-water and supply context where public drinking-water identity records are available. Source-water context helps explain treatment and supply exposure, but missing source records remain explicit rather than inferred.

Why might water rates be increasing in Springfield Water and Sewer Commission, MA?

Rate pressure can reflect capital investment needs, a declining customer base, revenue fragility, affordability constraints, or parent-government fiscal stress. The Rate Constraint and Revenue Fragility score families specifically measure these pressures where data is available from public financial disclosures.

What does the MISI score mean for Springfield Water and Sewer Commission, MA?

The MISI score (40.1/100) is a composite measure of structural risk across five families: Operational Stress, Capex Pressure, Revenue Fragility, Rate Constraint, and Governance Risk. The headline remains a blended structural stress composite rather than a pure physical-condition index. The current methodology also downweights factors that are nearly universal or very rare in the frozen national reference population, so one common contextual factor does not dominate the headline by itself. Higher scores indicate more structural stress. It is deterministic and source-backed, not a credit rating.

Munimetric Water System Profile

Springfield Water and Sewer Commission, MA

Name: Springfield Water and Sewer Commission, MA Water System Stress Profile
Creator: Munimetric
License: https://munimetric.com/terms

Drinking Water Infrastructure Profile

Munimetric analysis of drinking water infrastructure in Springfield Water and Sewer Commission, MA, Massachusetts, including MISI stress score, active signals, and peer-relative monitoring context. This profile highlights what is happening and why it matters using water-system, fiscal, capital, and signal context.

Springfield Water and Sewer Commission, MA has a MISI infrastructure stress score of 40.1/100 in the Fragile band as of 2026-09-01. Public records show surface-water sourcing, PFAS monitoring context, lead and copper compliance context and approximately 169,170 residents served. Updated May 2026.

FragileScore date Sep 1, 2026Methodology v0.1.2

State context

Current market shown in covered state context. Tile size reflects population served; color reflects stress band.

40.1Headline composite

FragileBand

98%Confidence

~169KPop. served

P85Peer percentile

10Active signals

Current headline composite

Component of current headline composite

Infrastructure Stress30.6 / 100

Physical, compliance, and capital-execution pressure reflected in the blended headline composite.

Socioeconomic Stress4.0 / 100

Affordability, demand-base, and parent-government fiscal pressure reflected in the blended headline composite.

Observability Stress5.5 / 100

Staleness, disclosure freshness, and reporting-visibility effects reflected in the blended headline composite.

40.1/100 headline compositeFragile98% confidencedrinking_water::community_water_system::100k_to_250k::surface_water~169K people served

Monitoring context stored

Water Quality & Supply Context

Public-record context for this system. Stored monitoring and compliance records only. Does not change MISI.

Public records

Records presentMAPWSID MA1281000.

Recent violations

42 records14 MRStage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule, Public Notice Rule and Revised PN Rule +3

Enforcement records

42 recordsStored public enforcement rows.

PFAS monitoring records

No listed detectionsUCMRStored PFAS monitoring records list 120 samples and 0 detections.

Lead/copper monitoring records

Records stored23 samplesStored lead/copper records list 0 open LCR violations and 0 action-level records.

Source / supply context

Surface waterIdentity169,170 served; Jun 30, 2026.

Not a real-time tap-water condition determination. Use official utility or state program records for current advisories.

Official records

Public drinking-water profileEPA ECHO / SDWIS: Federal public system profile and compliance summary.
Enforcement historyEPA ECHO: Federal compliance and enforcement detail for this drinking-water system.

Source notes

Methodology/source notesDisplayed from stored public drinking-water records and official program references. This layer does not change MISI.
Contaminant monitoring recordsEPA UCMR: PFAS context uses stored contaminant-monitoring summaries where available; missing records are not treated as non-detections.
State drinking-water programOfficial link not currently stored for this state program mapping.
Methodology/source notesOfficial annual consumer-confidence report links are not currently stored in this profile layer.

Executive context

What the Data Suggests

Springfield Water and Sewer Commission, MA's drinking-water system serves about 169,170 residents, making it a mid-size system within the coverage universe. The current reading places the system in a zone of moderate-to-elevated stress that goes beyond normal operating variation.

The score is being driven mainly by Capex Pressure, which is running high in the model, with Operational Stress adding another heavy layer of pressure. That combination suggests strain is showing up across core system functions, not just one isolated dimension.

6 active stress signals are attached to this system, including 4 at high severity. That signal mix points to a system where several warning indicators are firing at once, not just one extreme outlier.

Within Community · 100k–250k · Surface, this system ranks around the 85th percentile on measured stress, placing it among the more stressed systems in its peer group.

Recent observations suggest the system has been relatively steady rather than sharply improving or deteriorating — the current picture looks more like persistent underlying pressure than a sudden shift.

This summary is based on structured, source-backed public data and is intended for research and monitoring only. It is not investment advice, a credit opinion, or municipal advisory guidance.

Analytical posture

Market Stress Analytics

Family Contribution

MISI family contributions for this market.

Peer Position

Where Springfield Water and Sewer Commission sits within its peer cohort.

AvailableMissing

Score History

Latest

40.1

Trend

+32.1

Observations

109

Structural Indicators

Operational Stress15.1 / 20.0

Operational Stress totals 15.104 points, led by compliance escalation.

Capex Pressure15.5 / 20.0

Capex Pressure totals 15.486 points, led by lead & copper rule risk.

Revenue Fragility4.0 / 20.0

Revenue Fragility totals 3.994 points, led by high-agi out-migration.

Rate Constraint0.0 / 20.0

Rate Constraint totals 0.000 points with no triggered factors.

Governance Risk5.5 / 20.0

Governance Risk totals 5.473 points, led by utility data staleness.

Stress movement

Diagnostics

Diagnostics & Movement

Compact status for confidence, data coverage, disclosure freshness, and stored score movement. Detailed diagnostic history remains available below.

Confidence

98%

Confidence is mainly capped by document freshness.

Factor coverage

Complete

All tracked confidence factors are currently available.

Disclosure freshness

Not available

No attached disclosure document has a usable reference date.

Latest movement

flat 0.0

Compared with Aug 31, 2026.

Last material movement

-2.0

Recorded Aug 15, 2026.

History

109 observations stored

Latest stored observation Sep 1, 2026.

Show detailed diagnostic history

Expanded stress diagnostics

Open detailed contribution diagnostics

No detailed factor diagnostics are stored for this profile snapshot.

Confidence summary

Confidence is mainly capped by document freshness.

Missing factor coverage

No factor gaps are recorded on the latest stored score.

Disclosure freshness diagnostics

0 attached local documents · 0 structured facts

No attached disclosure document has a usable reference date.

Latest reference Not available · stale after Not available

Score movement

flat 0.0

Previous run Aug 31, 2026

Sep 1, 2026

Score 40.1 in band fragile. Confidence 98%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Aug 31, 2026

Score 40.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Aug 28, 2026

Score 40.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Aug 27, 2026

Score 40.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Aug 26, 2026

Score 40.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Aug 25, 2026

Score 40.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Aug 24, 2026

Score 40.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Aug 23, 2026

Score 40.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Aug 22, 2026

Score 40.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Aug 20, 2026

Score 40.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Aug 18, 2026

Score 40.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Aug 17, 2026

Score 40.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Aug 16, 2026

Score 40.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Aug 15, 2026

Score 40.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run -2.0

Aug 10, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Aug 9, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Aug 8, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Aug 3, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Aug 2, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Aug 1, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jul 31, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jul 30, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jul 29, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jul 23, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jul 22, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jul 21, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jul 20, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jul 19, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jul 18, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jul 17, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jul 16, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jul 14, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jul 13, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jul 12, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jul 11, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jul 10, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jul 9, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jul 8, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jul 7, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jul 6, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jul 5, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jul 4, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jul 3, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jul 2, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jul 1, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jun 30, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jun 29, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jun 28, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jun 23, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jun 22, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jun 16, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jun 15, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jun 14, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jun 12, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jun 11, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jun 8, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jun 2, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Jun 1, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 31, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 28, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 26, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 24, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 22, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 21, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 19, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 17, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 10, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 9, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 8, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 7, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 6, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 5, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 4, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 3, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

May 2, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 2.0

May 1, 2026

Score 40.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 30, 2026

Score 40.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 29, 2026

Score 40.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 28, 2026

Score 40.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 27, 2026

Score 40.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 26, 2026

Score 40.1 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run -1.9

Apr 26, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 25, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 24, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 23, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 22, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 21, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 19, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 18, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 14, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 13, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 10, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 9, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 8, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 7, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 6, 2026

Score 42.0 in band fragile. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 20.0

Apr 5, 2026

Score 22.0 in band watch. Confidence 84%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 5, 2026

Score 22.0 in band watch. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 4, 2026

Score 22.0 in band watch. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 3, 2026

Score 22.0 in band watch. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 3, 2026

Score 22.0 in band watch. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Apr 2, 2026

Score 22.0 in band watch. Confidence 97%.

Delta vs prior run 6.0

Mar 29, 2026

Score 16.0 in band stable. Confidence 86%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Mar 25, 2026

Score 16.0 in band stable. Confidence 86%.

Delta vs prior run 8.0

Mar 24, 2026

Score 8.0 in band stable. Confidence 72%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Mar 22, 2026

Score 8.0 in band stable. Confidence 72%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Mar 21, 2026

Score 8.0 in band stable. Confidence 72%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Mar 20, 2026

Score 8.0 in band stable. Confidence 72%.

Delta vs prior run 0.0

Mar 18, 2026

Score 8.0 in band stable. Confidence 72%.

Signals

Signal Timeline

MaterialresolvedNot availableRank #1

Signal: current drought severity
Score impact: Not available
Resolved: Aug 15, 2026

SignificantactiveNot availableRank #2

Signal: high agi outmigration
Score impact: Not available
Resolved: Active

SignificantactiveNot availableRank #3

Signal: lead copper rule risk
Score impact: Not available
Resolved: Active

SignificantactiveNot availableRank #4

Signal: climate hazard exposure
Score impact: Not available
Resolved: Active

SignificantresolvedNot availableRank #5

Signal: high agi outmigration
Score impact: Not available
Resolved: Apr 7, 2026

SignificantresolvedNot availableRank #6

Signal: lead copper rule risk
Score impact: Not available
Resolved: Apr 7, 2026

SignificantresolvedNot availableRank #7

Signal: climate hazard exposure
Score impact: Not available
Resolved: Apr 7, 2026

SignificantactiveNot availableRank #8

Signal: Utility Data Staleness
Score impact: Not available
Resolved: Active

MaterialactiveNot availableRank #9

Signal: Infrastructure Capital Gap
Score impact: Not available
Resolved: Active

MaterialactiveNot availableRank #10

Signal: Compliance Escalation
Score impact: Not available
Resolved: Active

Keep monitoring this market

Briefs and research access cover repeat monitoring, saved work, alerts, and team review.

Get the Water Stress Brief Request research access

About Springfield Water and Sewer Commission, MA

Springfield Water and Sewer Commission, MA is a community drinking-water system in Massachusetts that Munimetric monitors for infrastructure stress. The current MISI score of 40.1 out of 100 places this system in the fragile stress band as of 2026-09-01. The MISI composite reflects five structural risk families: Operational Stress, Capex Pressure, Revenue Fragility, Rate Constraint, and Governance Risk. Higher scores indicate more structural stress.

Data is assembled from EPA SDWA compliance records, American Community Survey demographic and economic indicators, FEMA National Risk Index hazard exposure data, state-reported financial disclosures, and stored public-record water quality context where available. This system serves approximately 169,170 people. The system has 42 recorded compliance violations in the SDWA record. Munimetric does not fabricate data where public records are unavailable. This profile is for structural monitoring and research—not a current-condition determination or credit rating. Updated May 2026.

What is the Munimetric score for Springfield Water and Sewer Commission, MA?: The current Munimetric Infrastructure Stress Index (MISI) score for Springfield Water and Sewer Commission, MA is 40.1 out of 100, placing this system in the fragile stress band. MISI is a composite of five structural risk families. Higher values indicate more stress. The score is deterministic, source-backed, and updated as new data becomes available.
Does Springfield Water and Sewer Commission, MA show signs of drinking-water infrastructure stress?: Munimetric monitors structural stress indicators for Springfield Water and Sewer Commission, MA across operational conditions, capital needs, revenue stability, rate affordability, and governance quality. The current MISI score and active signals shown in this profile reflect the latest available evidence from EPA, ACS, FEMA NRI, and state financial disclosures.
Does Munimetric rate current tap-water conditions for Springfield Water and Sewer Commission, MA?: No. Munimetric is not a water testing service and does not make current-condition determinations. This profile tracks structural conditions: compliance posture, financial pressure, infrastructure stress, and governance quality. For current water quality testing results, consult the system's Consumer Confidence Report or contact the local water utility.
Has Springfield Water and Sewer Commission, MA had a boil water advisory?: Munimetric does not track real-time boil water advisories. For current advisory status, contact your local water utility or state drinking water program. This profile tracks structural risk indicators and compliance history that provide long-term context around system reliability.
Are lead pipes or corrosion risk a concern in Springfield Water and Sewer Commission, MA?: Where EPA SDWA compliance data includes lead and copper rule monitoring, violations, or enforcement actions, that information feeds into the Operational Stress component of the MISI score. Munimetric does not fabricate lead pipe data where public records are silent.
Does Munimetric include PFAS monitoring context for Springfield Water and Sewer Commission, MA?: Where stored public records include UCMR or contaminant-monitoring summaries, Munimetric displays PFAS monitoring context as public-record evidence. Missing PFAS summaries are treated as missing records, not as non-detections. This context does not change MISI by itself.
What source-water context is available for Springfield Water and Sewer Commission, MA?: Munimetric displays stored source-water and supply context where public drinking-water identity records are available. Source-water context helps explain treatment and supply exposure, but missing source records remain explicit rather than inferred.
Why might water rates be increasing in Springfield Water and Sewer Commission, MA?: Rate pressure can reflect capital investment needs, a declining customer base, revenue fragility, affordability constraints, or parent-government fiscal stress. The Rate Constraint and Revenue Fragility score families specifically measure these pressures where data is available from public financial disclosures.
What does the MISI score mean for Springfield Water and Sewer Commission, MA?: The MISI score (40.1/100) is a composite measure of structural risk across five families: Operational Stress, Capex Pressure, Revenue Fragility, Rate Constraint, and Governance Risk. The headline remains a blended structural stress composite rather than a pure physical-condition index. The current methodology also downweights factors that are nearly universal or very rare in the frozen national reference population, so one common contextual factor does not dominate the headline by itself. Higher scores indicate more structural stress. It is deterministic and source-backed, not a credit rating.

Springfield Water and Sewer Commission, MA

Funding mix

Big projects (local)

Water Quality & Supply Context

What the Data Suggests

Market Stress Analytics

Score History

Structural Indicators

Diagnostics

Diagnostics & Movement

Expanded stress diagnostics

Confidence summary

Missing factor coverage

Disclosure freshness diagnostics

Score movement

Sep 1, 2026

Aug 31, 2026

Aug 28, 2026

Aug 27, 2026

Aug 26, 2026

Aug 25, 2026

Aug 24, 2026

Aug 23, 2026

Aug 22, 2026

Aug 20, 2026

Aug 18, 2026

Aug 17, 2026

Aug 16, 2026

Aug 15, 2026

Aug 10, 2026

Aug 9, 2026

Aug 8, 2026

Aug 3, 2026

Aug 2, 2026

Aug 1, 2026

Jul 31, 2026

Jul 30, 2026

Jul 29, 2026

Jul 23, 2026

Jul 22, 2026

Jul 21, 2026

Jul 20, 2026

Jul 19, 2026

Jul 18, 2026

Jul 17, 2026

Jul 16, 2026

Jul 14, 2026

Jul 13, 2026

Jul 12, 2026

Jul 11, 2026

Jul 10, 2026

Jul 9, 2026

Jul 8, 2026

Jul 7, 2026

Jul 6, 2026

Jul 5, 2026

Jul 4, 2026

Jul 3, 2026

Jul 2, 2026

Jul 1, 2026

Jun 30, 2026

Jun 29, 2026

Jun 28, 2026

Jun 23, 2026

Jun 22, 2026

Jun 16, 2026

Jun 15, 2026

Jun 14, 2026

Jun 12, 2026

Jun 11, 2026

Jun 8, 2026

Jun 2, 2026

Jun 1, 2026

May 31, 2026

May 28, 2026

May 26, 2026

May 24, 2026

May 22, 2026

May 21, 2026

May 19, 2026