Physical, compliance, and capital-execution pressure reflected in the blended headline composite.
Munimetric Water System Profile
Anaconda Water Department, MT
Drinking Water Infrastructure Profile
Munimetric drinking water infrastructure profile for Anaconda Water Department, MT, Montana, including MISI stress score, active signals, fiscal pressure, and peer comparison. This profile highlights what is happening and why it matters using water-system, fiscal, capital, and signal context.
Anaconda Water Department, MT has a MISI infrastructure stress score of 16.4/100 in the Stable band as of 2026-05-19. Public records show groundwater sourcing, PFAS monitoring context, lead and copper compliance context and approximately 6,750 residents served. Updated May 2026.
State context
Current market shown in covered state context. Tile size reflects population served; color reflects stress band.
Current headline composite
Component of current headline composite
Affordability, demand-base, and parent-government fiscal pressure reflected in the blended headline composite.
Staleness, disclosure freshness, and reporting-visibility effects reflected in the blended headline composite.
Monitoring context stored
Water Quality & Supply Context
Public-record context for this system. Stored monitoring and compliance records only. Does not change MISI.
Executive context
What the Data Suggests
Anaconda Water Department, MT is a smaller community water system, serving approximately 6,750 residents. At the latest reading, the system shows limited signs of structural stress.
The score is being driven mainly by Operational Stress, with Governance Risk contributing at a lower level. The pressure is distributed rather than concentrated in a single dimension.
3 active stress signals are attached to this system, including one at high severity. The breadth of active signals, even without concentrated high severity, suggests pressure across more than one dimension.
Within Community · < 25k · Ground, this system ranks around the 16th percentile on measured stress, placing it among the least stressed in its peer group.
Recent score history has been relatively steady, consistent with the system's overall profile.
This summary is based on structured, source-backed public data and is intended for research and monitoring only. It is not investment advice, a credit opinion, or municipal advisory guidance.
Analytical posture
Market Stress Analytics
Family Contribution
MISI family contributions for this market.
Peer Position
Where Anaconda Water Department sits within its peer cohort.
Score History
Latest
16.4
Trend
+10.4
Observations
41
Structural Indicators
Operational Stress totals 5.929 points, led by compliance escalation.
Capex Pressure totals 4.997 points, led by lead & copper rule risk.
Revenue Fragility totals 0.000 points with no triggered factors.
Rate Constraint totals 0.000 points with no triggered factors.
Governance Risk totals 5.473 points, led by utility data staleness.
Stress movement
Diagnostics
Diagnostics & Movement
Compact status for confidence, data coverage, disclosure freshness, and stored score movement. Detailed diagnostic history remains available below.
Confidence
86%
Confidence is mainly capped by document freshness.
Factor coverage
Complete
All tracked confidence factors are currently available.
Disclosure freshness
Not available
No attached disclosure document has a usable reference date.
Latest movement
flat 0.0
Compared with May 17, 2026.
Last material movement
-0.6
Recorded Apr 26, 2026.
History
41 observations stored
Latest stored observation May 19, 2026.
Show detailed diagnostic history
Expanded stress diagnostics
Open detailed contribution diagnostics
No detailed factor diagnostics are stored for this profile snapshot.
Confidence summary
Confidence is mainly capped by document freshness.
Missing factor coverage
No factor gaps are recorded on the latest stored score.
Disclosure freshness diagnostics
0 attached local documents · 0 structured facts
No attached disclosure document has a usable reference date.
Latest reference Not available · stale after Not available
Score movement
flat 0.0
Previous run May 17, 2026
May 19, 2026
Score 16.4 in band stable. Confidence 86%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 17, 2026
Score 16.4 in band stable. Confidence 86%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 10, 2026
Score 16.4 in band stable. Confidence 86%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 9, 2026
Score 16.4 in band stable. Confidence 86%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 8, 2026
Score 16.4 in band stable. Confidence 86%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 7, 2026
Score 16.4 in band stable. Confidence 86%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 6, 2026
Score 16.4 in band stable. Confidence 86%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 5, 2026
Score 16.4 in band stable. Confidence 86%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 4, 2026
Score 16.4 in band stable. Confidence 86%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 3, 2026
Score 16.4 in band stable. Confidence 86%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 2, 2026
Score 16.4 in band stable. Confidence 86%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
May 1, 2026
Score 16.4 in band stable. Confidence 86%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 30, 2026
Score 16.4 in band stable. Confidence 86%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 29, 2026
Score 16.4 in band stable. Confidence 86%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 28, 2026
Score 16.4 in band stable. Confidence 86%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 27, 2026
Score 16.4 in band stable. Confidence 86%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 26, 2026
Score 16.4 in band stable. Confidence 86%.
Delta vs prior run -0.6
Apr 26, 2026
Score 17.0 in band stable. Confidence 86%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 25, 2026
Score 17.0 in band stable. Confidence 86%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 24, 2026
Score 17.0 in band stable. Confidence 86%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 23, 2026
Score 17.0 in band stable. Confidence 86%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 22, 2026
Score 17.0 in band stable. Confidence 86%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 21, 2026
Score 17.0 in band stable. Confidence 86%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 19, 2026
Score 17.0 in band stable. Confidence 86%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 18, 2026
Score 17.0 in band stable. Confidence 86%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 14, 2026
Score 17.0 in band stable. Confidence 86%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 13, 2026
Score 17.0 in band stable. Confidence 86%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 10, 2026
Score 17.0 in band stable. Confidence 86%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 9, 2026
Score 17.0 in band stable. Confidence 86%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 8, 2026
Score 17.0 in band stable. Confidence 86%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 7, 2026
Score 17.0 in band stable. Confidence 86%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 6, 2026
Score 17.0 in band stable. Confidence 86%.
Delta vs prior run 5.0
Apr 5, 2026
Score 12.0 in band stable. Confidence 73%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 5, 2026
Score 12.0 in band stable. Confidence 82%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 4, 2026
Score 12.0 in band stable. Confidence 82%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 3, 2026
Score 12.0 in band stable. Confidence 82%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 3, 2026
Score 12.0 in band stable. Confidence 82%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Apr 2, 2026
Score 12.0 in band stable. Confidence 82%.
Delta vs prior run 6.0
Mar 29, 2026
Score 6.0 in band stable. Confidence 79%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Mar 25, 2026
Score 6.0 in band stable. Confidence 79%.
Delta vs prior run 0.0
Mar 24, 2026
Score 6.0 in band stable. Confidence 72%.
Signals
Signal Timeline
- Signal
- lead copper rule risk
- Score impact
- Not available
- Resolved
- Active
- Signal
- lead copper rule risk
- Score impact
- Not available
- Resolved
- Apr 7, 2026
- Signal
- Utility Data Staleness
- Score impact
- Not available
- Resolved
- Active
- Signal
- Compliance Escalation
- Score impact
- Not available
- Resolved
- Active
Keep monitoring this market
Briefs and workflow access cover repeat monitoring, saved work, exports, Track, and Munex workflows.
About Anaconda Water Department, MT
Anaconda Water Department, MT is a community drinking-water system in Montana that Munimetric monitors for infrastructure stress. The current MISI score of 16.4 out of 100 places this system in the stable stress band as of 2026-05-19. The MISI composite reflects five structural risk families: Operational Stress, Capex Pressure, Revenue Fragility, Rate Constraint, and Governance Risk. Higher scores indicate more structural stress.
Data is assembled from EPA SDWA compliance records, American Community Survey demographic and economic indicators, FEMA National Risk Index hazard exposure data, state-reported financial disclosures, and stored public-record water quality context where available. This system serves approximately 6,750 people. The system has 96 recorded compliance violations in the SDWA record. Munimetric does not fabricate data where public records are unavailable. This profile is for structural monitoring and research—not a current-condition determination or credit rating. Updated May 2026.
- What is the Munimetric score for Anaconda Water Department, MT?
- The current Munimetric Infrastructure Stress Index (MISI) score for Anaconda Water Department, MT is 16.4 out of 100, placing this system in the stable stress band. MISI is a composite of five structural risk families. Higher values indicate more stress. The score is deterministic, source-backed, and updated as new data becomes available.
- Does Anaconda Water Department, MT show signs of drinking-water infrastructure stress?
- Munimetric monitors structural stress indicators for Anaconda Water Department, MT across operational conditions, capital needs, revenue stability, rate affordability, and governance quality. The current MISI score and active signals shown in this profile reflect the latest available evidence from EPA, ACS, FEMA NRI, and state financial disclosures.
- Does Munimetric rate current tap-water conditions for Anaconda Water Department, MT?
- No. Munimetric is not a water testing service and does not make current-condition determinations. This profile tracks structural conditions: compliance posture, financial pressure, infrastructure stress, and governance quality. For current water quality testing results, consult the system's Consumer Confidence Report or contact the local water utility.
- Has Anaconda Water Department, MT had a boil water advisory?
- Munimetric does not track real-time boil water advisories. For current advisory status, contact your local water utility or state drinking water program. This profile tracks structural risk indicators and compliance history that provide long-term context around system reliability.
- Are lead pipes or corrosion risk a concern in Anaconda Water Department, MT?
- Where EPA SDWA compliance data includes lead and copper rule monitoring, violations, or enforcement actions, that information feeds into the Operational Stress component of the MISI score. Munimetric does not fabricate lead pipe data where public records are silent.
- Does Munimetric include PFAS monitoring context for Anaconda Water Department, MT?
- Where stored public records include UCMR or contaminant-monitoring summaries, Munimetric displays PFAS monitoring context as public-record evidence. Missing PFAS summaries are treated as missing records, not as non-detections. This context does not change MISI by itself.
- What source-water context is available for Anaconda Water Department, MT?
- Munimetric displays stored source-water and supply context where public drinking-water identity records are available. Source-water context helps explain treatment and supply exposure, but missing source records remain explicit rather than inferred.
- Why might water rates be increasing in Anaconda Water Department, MT?
- Rate pressure can reflect capital investment needs, a declining customer base, revenue fragility, affordability constraints, or parent-government fiscal stress. The Rate Constraint and Revenue Fragility score families specifically measure these pressures where data is available from public financial disclosures.
- What does the MISI score mean for Anaconda Water Department, MT?
- The MISI score (16.4/100) is a composite measure of structural risk across five families: Operational Stress, Capex Pressure, Revenue Fragility, Rate Constraint, and Governance Risk. The headline remains a blended structural stress composite rather than a pure physical-condition index. The current methodology also downweights factors that are nearly universal or very rare in the frozen national reference population, so one common contextual factor does not dominate the headline by itself. Higher scores indicate more structural stress. It is deterministic and source-backed, not a credit rating.
- U.S. water infrastructure stress monitoring homepage
- Water infrastructure risk in Montana
- How Munimetric scores drinking water systems
- Compare water system profiles in the Screener
- Water infrastructure risk by state
- Water infrastructure research & guides
- Munimetric analytical rankings
- Water Systems with Utility Data Staleness
- Systems with Compliance Escalation
- Largest Water Systems with Compliance Escalation
- Montana MISI stress-band comparison hub
- Montana water systems by population served
- Montana water systems by source-water context